
- Introduction
India, long celebrated as a tolerant ‘unity in diversity’ democracy, now faces existential questions. Under Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist BJP, religious violence has surged, institutions are politicized, and the world watches—uneasily—as a potential superpower fractures along old fault lines.

- Modi’s Rise & Hindu Nationalism
- Background:Modi’s roots in RSS (far-right Hindu group – Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right-wing Hindutva paramilitary volunteer organisation.), 2002 Gujarat riots controversy. (Modi as a chief minister of Gujarat)
- Policies:
- Citizenship Amendment Act (2019): Fast-tracks citizenship for non-Muslim migrants.
- Article 370 repeal: Stripped Kashmir’s autonomy (Muslim-majority region).
- Data Point:
- Religious violence rises since 2014 (per HRW).
- The Myth of Tolerance
- Pre-Modi Era: Examples of Hindu-Muslim syncretism. Here is more detailed look at some examples: Let’s look at some more detailed at these examples:
1. Sikhism: Sikhism, founded by Guru Nanak, is a monotheistic religion that incorporates elements from both Hinduism and Islam. Sikhs believe in one formless God and follow the teachings of the ten Gurus, as enshrined in the Guru Granth Sahib, which includes hymns and prayers from both Hindu and Muslim saints. Sikhism also emphasizes social equality and rejects idol worship, reflecting both Hindu and Islamic influences.
2. Din-i-Ilahi: Mughal Emperor Akbar’s attempt to create a syncretic religion, Din-i-Ilahi, aimed to unify his diverse empire. It drew upon Islamic Sufism, Hindu philosophies, and even some elements of Christianity and Zoroastrianism. However, it was more of a personal quest for Akbar and a philosophical approach to governance rather than a widely adopted religion.
- Today:
- Lynching mobs target Muslims over cow slaughter rumors. Vigilante ‘Cow Protection’ Groups Attack Minorities
Image 2: Cattle seized by cow vigilantes in a cow shelter in Barsana, Uttar Pradesh, June 2017. - Sikh farmers’ protests met with state violence. – 2020-2021 farmers’ protests
Image 3: 2020_Indian_farmers’_protest_-_Roadblock-violence
- Lynching mobs target Muslims over cow slaughter rumors. Vigilante ‘Cow Protection’ Groups Attack Minorities
- Quote: “My Sikh friend won’t wear his turban in Delhi anymore.” (Anonymous testimonial).
- Bhupinder Virdi quotes:
Hi paranjay, i am really happy to see that you are interested in knowing this.
Firstly, a brief piece of knowledge i would like to share and ask you to follow is; Turban is tied never worn. So whenever u refer to turban say tied not worn. You might ask, why so? Because we wear a cap,hat or any other headgear. But, we sikhs believe that turban is not merely a headgear but a part of us, our body and its purity is what makes it special.
Secondly, Paranjay we sikhs dont wear caps instead of turbans. We may wear it as an alternative because turban has to be of a certain size and its quite an energy absorbing task to keep it tied 24*7.
Thirdly, wearing cap is just a matter of choice. Some dont wear it when not tying turban. Some wear “parna”( smaller version of turban). Or tie “patka”(usually kids tie it to avoid the weight of turban aged b/w 4–15 yrs).
Thirdly, as mentioned because of its size during some tasks you cant tie turban. Lets say river rafting, now turban for sikhs is the most honourable identity that our guru gave us so it has to be respected and while rafting due to its rough nature you might end up falling in water and your turban floating in the river going away or getting torned and obviously becoming dirty. So we avoid wearing turban on such occasion.
Now, wearing cap is more a fashion fad. To look cool. But believe me it doesn’t make you any less religious(for my sikh brothers who might object.) And not cool too.
To sum up, its a matter of choice but its not neccessary to wear a cap when not tying turban.
Thanks, Cheers!
- Geopolitical Paradox
- Military Power: World’s 2nd-largest military
2nd largest military , nuclear-armed
India nuclear arsenal of 179 warheads , BRICS member.
Brics member - Pakistan Split:1947 Partition trauma “India-Pakistan Patition“+ ongoing “Kashmir conflict“.
Image 4: The disputed region, divided between India (blue), Pakistan (green), and China (yellow) - S. Courtship: Biden calls India a “critical partner” despite rights abuses.
Italy, Rome- October 29, 2021.G20 summit in Rome. .EU@G20 Summit 2021.President Michel and President Von der Leyen meet Prime Minister of India.From left to right: Charles Michel (President of the European Council), Narendra Modi (Prime Minister of India), Ursula Von del Leyen,Image: 640453080, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: * France, Germany and Italy Rights Out *, Model Release: no, Credit line: Pignatelli/EUC / Zuma Press / Forum
- Conclusion (Call to Action)
“India’s soul hangs in the balance. Will it return to pluralism, or become a Hindu supremacist state? The answer affects billions—and could destabilize Asia. Share this article. Tag Indian diplomats. #SaveIndianDemocracy
It is shame full for the democracy. India is the only country the world with hundreds of different languages and have nearly all the worlds religions for hundreds of year’s. Not many known conflicts before 1947.
Efter independence, Indian̈ democracy gave birth to democratic life style and mutual for different way of life
But clock turned back as soon as BJP took possession of everything. If Indians didn’t wake up, Churchills predictions will be proved.
I am afraid that India will be broken in to the many small states
Unfortunately, I think as the nationalist gaining over the other parts, as i can see f.ex. in tweeter and elsewhere, it’s a very dangerous route the country is running on. We hope the best…