Posted on Leave a comment

“Drug War” or Oil War? The Real Reason US Warships Are Heading to Venezuela

Washington’s hypocrisy is on full display: sending destroyers to “fight drugs” while actively starving a nation and plotting regime change over the world’s largest oil reserves, this time Venezuela.

Image 1: US warships carrying over 2,500 Marines heading toward Venezuela may arrive as early as this week

1. The “Anti-Drug” Mission: A Classic US Pretext

The United States has announced it is sending three warships toward Venezuelan waters under the guise of combating “narco-terrorism.” This is not a new script.

We’ve seen this before:

  • Iraq 2003: “Weapons of Mass Destruction”

  • Libya 2011: “Protecting Civilians”

    Image 2: The United States has deployed to support for Libya’s people of freedom and their prosperity to continue in secure manner: a naval force of 11 ships, including the amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge, the amphibious transport dock USS Ponce, the guided-missile destroyers USS Barry and USS Stout, the nuclear attack submarines USS Providence and USS Scranton, the cruise missile submarine USS Florida and the amphibious command ship USS Mount Whitney. Additionally, B-2 stealth bombers, AV-8B Harrier II ground-attack aircraft, EA-18 and F-15 and F-16 fighters have been involved in action over Libya.U-2 reconnaissance aircraft are stationed on Cyprus. On 18 March, two AC-130Us arrived at RAF Mildenhall as well as additional tanker aircraft. On 24 March 2 E-8Cs operated from Naval Station Rota Spain, which indicates an increase of ground attacks. The Following map shows where the location that Pro-Gaddafi forces controlled and where the place controled by anti-Gaddafi forces: Source: wikipedia
  • Syria: “Fighting Terrorism”

    Image 3: We will maintain our mission in northeast Syria: US – North press agency

Now, Venezuela is the next target—and the excuse is just as transparent.

The real goal? To destabilize the government of Nicolás Maduro, who Washington refuses to recognize because he dares to prioritize Venezuelan sovereignty over U.S. demands.

2. The Oil in the Room: Why Venezuela Really Matters

Venezuela holds the largest proven oil reserves on the planet. That is not a coincidence—it is the reason.

Image 4: Venezuela is the biggest oil reserves in the world with its 304 billion barrels.

The U.S. does not intervene in:

  • Real drug hubs in Honduras or Guatemala

    Image 5: Narcotrafficking network in Honduras
  • Actual dictatorships like Saudi Arabia

    Image 6: Call them ‘Dictators’, not ‘Kings’

It intervenes where strategic resources are at stake. The playbook is simple:

  1. Sanction the country into economic crisis.

  2. Fund opposition movements and call them “the real government.”

  3. Create humanitarian chaos.

  4. Invade or orchestrate coup under a “humanitarian” or “anti-drug” pretext.

It’s regime change 101.

3. The “Guaidó Project”: A Failed Puppet

Image 6: Left to right: coup leader Juan Guaidó, Colombian President Iván Duque and Vice President Mike Pence

For years, the U.S. backed Juan Guaidó—a man who never won a national election—as the “legitimate” president of Venezuela. The goal was to create a parallel government willing to hand over Venezuela’s oil to U.S. corporations.

The plan failed. Guaidó had no real domestic support, and the Venezuelan military remained loyal to Maduro.

Image 7: Venezuela Defense Chief Says Troops to Remain Loyal to Maduro

Now, with diplomacy failing, the U.S. is escalating toward military intimidation.

4. Sanctions = Economic Warfare

The U.S. has imposed crushing sanctions on Venezuela:

  • Blocking oil exports

  • Freezing foreign assets

  • Limiting food and medicine imports

These are not “targeted” sanctions. They are collective punishment designed to make the population suffer until they overthrow their own government.

The result? The richest country in oil is now one of the poorest in stability—by U.S. design.

Image 8: Venezuela indeed should be paradise, but because of the US sanctions the total poverty exceeded 87% in 2017

5. What’s Next: Syria in Latin America?

If the U.S. succeeds in triggering unrest, Venezuela could descend into a proxy war:

  • US-backed factions vs. government loyalists

  • Destabilized region: Colombia and Brazil may be drawn in

  • Mass refugee crises

  • Another generation lost to war

All while the U.S. positions itself to control the oil.

Image 9: Why is oil in Venezuela a responsibility of USA

6. The Real Drug Lords

While the U.S. claims to fight drugs, it ignores that the largest drug consumer market is in the United States. The real “narco-terrorism” is fueled by American demand and American banks that launder drug money.

This isn’t about drugs. It’s about domination.

 

 

Posted on Leave a comment

Moldova’s NATO Transformation: Europe’s Next Proxy War with Russia

EU arms flood in, defense budgets double, and Greece’s weapons factories gear up—as Moldova becomes NATO’s next Ukraine.

1. NATO’s Moldova Blueprint (2022-2030)

A. EU Militarization via the “European Peace Facility”

Image 1: European Union ambassadors will green-light the bloc’s biggest-ever lethal military aid package to Moldova, worth 20 million euros.

€60 Million Military Aid (2024):

    • Short-range air defense (to counter Russian drones) – “According to the proposal, seen by RFE/RL, some of the money will cover “eight short-range air-defense systems consisting of approximately eight launchers and approximately 24 missiles.”

    • Radar systems (surveillance of Transnistria)

    • French artillery + German armored vehicles (EU Commission Report)

  • 2030 Defense Strategy:

    • 1% GDP military spending (double 2023 levels)

    • Full NATO interoperability (joint drills, intel sharing)

B. U.S./NATO’s $1.5 Billion Arms Pipeline

  • Polish Piorun air defense systems (used in Ukraine) Piorun Missile (A Polish man-portable air-defense system, designed to destroy low-flying aircraft, airplanes, helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles.)

    Image 2: Polish Piorun
  • Pirana armored vehicles + sniper kits

    Image 3: PIRANHA 8×8 APC
  • 2025 Plan: 50% increase in lethal aid (Modern Diplomacy)

2. Greece: NATO’s Balkan Arms Depot

A. Alexandroupolis Port: The New Ramstein

  • Current Role: 80% of Ukraine-bound arms transit here.

    Image 4: Providing military assistance to Ukraine and to counter malign actors and exercise and operate in the Balkans and eastern Mediterranean and the Black Sea region – Says former US def. minster Austin
  • Future Role: Moldova supply hub via Bulgaria-Romania rail lines. Quote from:Central European TimesRomania could also buy Moldovan port from EBRD

    The planned expansion of Constanta, along with Romania’s possible acquisition of Moldova’s River Danube port Giurgiulesti from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), shows Romania’s long-term ambition to establish itself as a primary logistics node for CEE.

    The infrastructure upgrades could also establish CEE as a low-cost manufacturing hub, attracting companies who are seeking out shorter and more secure supply chains.

    The EU is meanwhile interested in strengthening CEE’s logistics capabilities and securing alternative trade routes. The transformation of Constanta into a hub would reshape trade dynamics in CEE and potentially draw more nations into EU-aligned economic initiatives.”

B. Hellenic Defense Systems (HDS)

  • Controlled by CSG Holdings (major Ukraine war supplier).

  • Production Surge:

    • Mortars for Moldova

    • Image 5: NATO’s military presence in the east of the Alliance – https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_136388.htm

      Ammo for NATO’s eastern flank

      3. The Transnistria Endgame

      Image 6: Industrial facilities have all been closed down in Transnistria since Gazprom cut off gas supplies. / bne IntelliNews
      A. Moldova’s Coming Offensive
      • Sandu’s 2024 Plan: “Reintegrate” Transnistria via:

        • Economic blockade (cutting Russian subsidies)

        • Hybrid warfare (cyberattacks, protests)

      • Russian Response: 10,000 troops will not evacuate (Crimea 2014 precedent).

      B. NATO’s Red Line

      • Article 5 Trap: If Moldova attacks Transnistria and Russia retaliates, NATO could be dragged in.

        Image 7: Russia says: Moldova’s alignment with NATO would “spell the beginning of the end” for the country, and accused Sandu of allowing Moldova to be used by the alliance in its standoff with Russia
      • Greek Targets: Russian strikes on Alexandroupolis would trigger NATO-Russia war.

      Visual: Map of Transnistria chokehold on Ukraine’s Odessa.

      Image 8: The tiny statelet of Transnistria is squeezed on all sides

       

      4. Global Implications

      A. BRICS Counter-Moves

      • Russia’s Warning: “Moldova will face ‘consequences’ like Ukraine.”

      • China’s Stance: Silent but monitoring NATO’s Balkan encirclement.

    • B. The Repeating Playbook

      1. Ukraine 2014: EU funds Maidan → War.

      2. Moldova 2024: EU arms Sandu → ?    “Moldova’s upcoming parliamentary elections, set for this September, are expected to be a defining moment for the country’s future — a choice between continuing on its path toward integration with the European Union or shifting back toward Moscow’s influence.”

This is Ukraine 2.0 in motion. Share everywhere. Demand:

  1. Halt EU arms to Moldova

  2. Expose NATO’s Greek arms factories

  3. Sanction CSG Holdings

Tag your MPs. #StopMoldovaWar

Posted on Leave a comment

NATO’s Bloody Empire: From Yugoslavia to Ukraine

 1: The Myth of NATO’s ‘Peacekeeping’

  • Hook: “In 1990, NATO promised no eastward expansion. Today, it’s at Russia’s border—surrounded by U.S. bases, hungry for Ukraine. This is how ‘defensive’ alliances start world wars.”

Not an inch of #NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.” —Memorandum of conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and James Baker in Moscow, 9 Feb 9 1990
Image 1: Not an inch of #NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.” —Memorandum of conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and James Baker in Moscow, 9 Feb 9 1990

 

  • Thesis: NATO is a post-WW2 relic that morphed into a global enforcer for Western capital and militarism.

2. NATO’s Original Sins: A Rogue Alliance

  • 1999: Yugoslavia (The ‘Humanitarian’ War Lie)

    • Image 2: On March 24, 1999, the NATO bloc led by the US commenced terror bombings of Yugoslavia, which lasted 78 days

      78-day bombing of Serbia (including hospitals, bridges, TV stations).

    • Result: 2,500+ civilians killed, Kosovo turned into a U.S. base (Camp Bondsteel).

      Image 3: Camp_bondsteel_kosovo

       

  • 2001: Afghanistan (Forever War)

    • NATO’s first “Article 5” invocation—used to justify 20 years of occupation.

      Image 4: attack against one Ally is an attack against all — is at the core of the NATO Alliance and remains an enduring principle binding all Allies together.
    • Result: $2T spent, 200,000+ dead, Taliban back in power.

  • 2011: Libya (Democracy = Oil Theft)

    • UN Resolution 1973 abused to bomb Libya (50,000+ dead).

      Image 5: The NATO bombing plunged Libya into a humanitarian disaster, killing thousands of people.
    • Result: Slave markets, chaos, and $200B in oil contracts for France/Italy.

3. NATO Expansion: The Road to Ukraine

  • Broken Promises: Declassified docs show NATO vowed “not one inch eastward” (1990). (Image 1)

  • Provoking Russia:

    • 2008: Bush pushes NATO membership for Ukraine/Georgia → Russia warns red line.

      Image 6: Ukrainian politicians hold banners as they stage a protest during the Russian State Duma lower house of parliament speaker Sergei Naryshkin’s speech in Bucharest, Romania in November 2015. Photo provided by Inquam Photos via Reuters
    • 2014: U.S.-backed coup in Ukraine → Crimea annexation.

    • Image 7: A protester sits on a monument in Kyiv during clashes with riot police in February 2014. Louisa Gouliamaki/AFP/Getty

      2022: NATO arms Ukraine → Proxy war begins.

  • Cold War 2.0: NATO now includes Finland, Sweden, encircling Russia.

    Image 9: Sweden(April 2024) & Finland(May 2022) join Nato

     

4. NATO’s Kill List: Syria, Iraq, and Beyond

  • Syria: NATO allies (Turkey, U.S.) fund jihadists to overthrow Assad → 500,000 dead.

    image 10: 2 Nato nations at war in Syria

     

  • Iraq: No NATO mandate, but key members (UK, Poland) join Bush’s WMD lies → 1M+ dead.

    Image 11: 2003: President Bush announces invasion of Iraq

     

  • Africa: AFRICOM (NATO’s cousin) fuels coups (Mali, Niger) to control resources.

    Image 12: The legacies of colonialism and the US War on Terror in West Africa

5. NATO’s Endgame: WW3 for Hegemony

  • Ukraine as Proxy: $200B in weapons prolongs war; NATO admits “weakening Russia” is the goal.

    Image 13: NATO Chief Says Weakening Russia Will Help US Focus on Challenging China – Newsweek

     

  • Asia Pivot: NATO now targets China (“global alliance”).

    Image 14: China promises ‘resolute response’ to any NATO expansion in Asia

     

  • Nuclear Brinkmanship: NATO stations nukes in Belgium, Germany, Turkey → Russia responds.

    Image 15: NATO nuclear weapons mapped

6. Conclusion: Dismantle the War Machine

  • “NATO doesn’t ‘defend’—it conquers. It doesn’t ‘stabilize’—it loots. Until we abolish it, WW3 is a matter of time.”

  • Call to Action:

    • “Share this article. Protest NATO summits. Demand your country exit this death cult. #AbolishNATO”

Posted on 1 Comment

From Iraq to Iran: The Same Old Lies

  1. Iraq (2003): The Original Sin

  2. Libya (2011): NATO’s Slave State

    • Hillary’s “We Came, We Saw, He Died” Gaddaffi’s death → Open-air slave markets by 2015 (UN Report).https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/1/26/slavery-in-libya-life-inside-a-container

      Image 2: Human trafficking networks have prospered amid lawlessness, created by the warring militias that have been fighting for control of territories since the toppling of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011
    • Visual: Libya chaos map vs. pre-2011 GDP.

      Image 3: Contemporary Libya is less a nation than a geographical construct populated by competing and often interlocking tribes and clans. The Zintan (here Zentan) of the western regions and the Misrata (here Misurata) are perhaps the most prominent today locked in a deadly battle for control of the country and its resources.
  3. Iran (2024): Sanctions = War Crimes

  4. The BRICS Escape Plan

 

In 2003, the U.S. invaded Iraq based on fabricated evidence of ‘weapons of mass destruction.’ Today, we hear identical rhetoric about Iran’s nuclear program—despite the IAEA’s repeated confirmations that no evidence of weaponization exists. The parallels are chilling:

 

  • Then: Colin Powell’s infamous UN speech waving a fake vial of anthrax.
  • Now: Netanyahu’s cartoon bomb theatrics at the UN (2012) and recycled ‘imminent threat’ claims.
    The lesson? When governments cry ‘WMDs,’ always ask: Where’s the proof? And why does Israel—with 600+ undeclared warheads—get a free pass while Iran faces bombs and sanctions?

 

Israel’s Dimona nuclear facility (600+ warheads) vs. IAEA-monitored Iranian sites. Who’s the real threat?


1. For Citizens of NATO States:

STOP FUNDING THIS MADNESS.

  • Boycott war corporations (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, BlackRock).

  • Flood your MP with this article (+ use #AskYourPM).

  • Convert $ to gold/crypto—starve the war machine.


2. For Global South Audiences:

JOIN THE REVOLUTION.

  • Demand your govt fast-tracks BRICS membership.

  • Share this article with #WestInDecline.

  • Learn yuan/ruble trades—be sanctions-proof.

    Image 6: revolution