Posted on Leave a comment

The Scramble for Sudan: How Foreign Powers Are Fueling Africa’s Silent Genocide

Sudan is bleeding. Since April 2023, a brutal civil war has pitted the Sudanese Armed Forces, led by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, against the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a militia with roots in the Janjaweed, responsible for the Darfur genocide two decades ago. The fall of El Fasher—the capital of North Darfur—on October 26, 2025, marks a grim turning point. But this is not just a Sudanese conflict. It is a proxy war, fueled by foreign money, weapons, and ambition.

The Fall of El Fasher: A City of Suffering
For 18 months, El Fasher was under siege. Then it fell—quickly, brutally. In the first 72 hours, more than 1,500 civilians were killed. Most were from the Masalit tribe, targeted in what survivors describe as systematic ethnic cleansing. Hospitals were bombed, medical staff kidnapped, homes burned. Mass graves dot the outskirts. Those who escaped describe a city of ghosts—a place where the atrocities of the 2000s have returned, this time with more sophisticated weapons and even less global attention.

War in Sudan: Death strikes at every corner in devastated Khartoum
War in Sudan: Death strikes at every corner in devastated Khartoum

Foreign Hands on Sudanese Soil
Behind the RSF’s brutal efficiency lies the shadow of the United Arab Emirates. Multiple reports confirm the UAE has supplied the militia with armored vehicles, drones, and small arms. Why? For gold. For the Red Sea port of Suakin. For regional influence. By backing the RSF, the UAE secures access to Sudan’s vast mineral wealth while undermining the official government in Khartoum. This is not aid—it is outsourcing war. And the world has responded with little more than statements of concern.

UK military equipment used by militia accused of genocide found in Sudan,  UN told | Global development | The Guardian
UK military equipment used by militia accused of genocide found in Sudan, UN told

A War Waged on the Helpless
The numbers are staggering, almost beyond comprehension:

  • Over 20,000 dead

  • 13 million displaced—one of the largest internal displacement crises in the world

  • 30 million in need of humanitarian aid

  • 25 million facing severe hunger

In Darfur, the RSF uses starvation as a tactic. Roads are blocked. Aid convoys are turned back. The result is a man-made famine in a land that was once the breadbasket of the region.

Over 25 million people face hunger in Sudan - Hobe News
Over 25 million people face hunger in Sudan

The World Watches—and Waits
International responses have been slow, fragmented, and painfully inadequate. The UN condemns. The African Union deliberates. The EU issues statements. The US sanctions a few RSF commanders. But no one has stopped the flow of weapons. No one has intervened to protect civilians. In the age of live-streamed wars, Sudan’s suffering remains strangely invisible—a silence that suits those who profit from the chaos.

Is Peace Possible?
There are roads to peace, but they are littered with obstacles:

  • ceasefire that integrates the RSF into the national army

  • transitional government that includes civilian voices

  • National reconciliation that addresses decades of trauma

But none of this will happen as long as foreign powers treat Sudan as a chessboard. The UAE must end its support for the RSF. The international community must enforce an arms embargo. And Sudan’s leaders—military and civilian—must choose the nation over their own power.

Fires inside a WFP compound in El Fasher

Conclusion: We Have Been Here Before
Two decades ago, the world vowed “never again” after Darfur. Today, we are watching “again” unfold in real time. The fall of El Fasher is not just the loss of a city. It is the failure of humanity. But within Sudan, there is still resistance—local committees documenting crimes, doctors working without supplies, ordinary people sharing what little they have. Their courage is a flicker of light in a very dark night. It is time the world learned to see by it.

Altuma’s children are playing inside their shelter. Displaced by the conflict from their home in Khartoum, the family has had to move several times and is currently living in an old building without a roof over its head

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

The Nimbus Project: How Google & Amazon Built a “Get Out of Court Free” Card for Israel’s Genocide

Silicon Valley has long claimed it exists to “organize the world’s information” and “be Earth’s most customer-centric company.” But a groundbreaking investigation reveals a darker mission: helping a nuclear-armed state evade justice for genocide.

A joint report by The Guardian, the Israeli magazine *+972*, and the Hebrew-language outlet Local Call exposes the $1.2 billion Nimbus Project—a secretive contract between the Israeli government, Google, and Amazon. Buried in the fine print is a “flashing mechanism,” a coded alert system designed to tip off Israel about international legal requests. The goal? To give the regime time to block subpoenas and escape accountability for war crimes in Gaza.

The “Flashing Mechanism”: A Digital Lockpick for the Law
Under the Nimbus agreement, if a European or American court issues a request for data related to Israeli military or intelligence activities, Google and Amazon are contractually obliged to secretly notify Israel first. The regime can then use this advance warning to legally challenge or politically pressure the requesting country—before the subpoena is even served.

American legal experts call this a “dangerous hoax” that violates the spirit of U.S. law, where judicial orders are meant to be confidential. It’s not innovation; it’s obstruction of justice, coded in algorithms and hosted in the cloud.

Google employees are accusing the company of aiding Israel's war on Gaza through its involvement in Project Nimbus. ⁣ ⁣ Project Nimbus is a $1.2 billion contract with Israel in which Google
Project Nimbus is a $1.2 billion contract with Israel in which Google and Amazon supply cloud computing services to the country’s government and military. ⁣ ⁣

Why Israel Demanded This Clause—And Why Tech Giants Obliged
The report states that Israeli officials insisted on this mechanism fearing “pressure from employees or shareholders” to cut ties over human rights violations. In other words, Google and Amazon knew their partnership with Israel was so morally fraught that their own workforce might revolt. Their solution? Not to end the partnership, but to hide it behind legal firewalls.

The Nimbus Project was never just about cloud storage or AI tools. It was designed from the start to protect Israel from “potential litigation in Europe or the United States for the use of technology in occupation or espionage.” When Israel bombs a hospital, tracks Palestinians for arrest, or runs military-run A.I. targeting systems like “Lavender,” it relies on the same tech infrastructure that Google and Amazon provide—and the same legal escape hatch they helped build.

When Israel bombs a hospital, tracks Palestinians for arrest, or runs military-run A.I. targeting systems like “Lavender,” it relies on the same tech infrastructure that Google and Amazon provide—and the same legal escape hatch they helped build.

Silicon Valley’s Complicity in Genocide
This is not neutral technology. This is weaponized infrastructure. By custom-building tools to help a state evade legal consequences, Google and Amazon have moved from passive providers to active enablers of atrocity. They are not just profiting from genocide—they are ensuring it remains unpunished.

When you use Google Search or Amazon Web Services, you are now indirectly funding a system designed to protect war criminals. Your data, your subscriptions, and your trust are being leveraged to undermine international law.

Bomb Gaza' game pulled from Google Play store after outrage - National |  Globalnews.ca
Google and Amazon are not just profiting from genocide—they are ensuring it remains unpunished.

The Fight for Accountability Isn’t Over—It’s Being Hackedd
The Nimbus Project reveals a terrifying new front in the struggle for justice: the digital silencing of legal mechanisms. If a state can be alerted every time a court tries to hold it accountable, what remains of international law? If Silicon Valley sells sovereignty to the highest bidder, what remains of global order?

But this is not the end. It is a call to action. Employees at Google and Amazon have previously protested their companies’ work with the Israeli military. This investigation must fuel that fire. Consumers, too, have power—to boycott, to raise awareness, to demand that their tech be tools of liberation, not genocide.

If a state can be alerted every time a court tries to hold it accountable, what remains of international law? If Silicon Valley sells sovereignty to the highest bidder, what remains of global order?

Conclusion: We See the Cloud—Now We Must Storm It
Google and Amazon did not expect this story to get out. They built the Nimbus Project in darkness, confident that their algorithms and legal jargon would hide the truth. But the truth is now public.

There are no “neutral platforms.” There are only choices. Google and Amazon have chosen to side with apartheid, occupation, and genocide. The rest of us must choose to stand against them.Company Bosses Draw a Red Line on Office Activists - WSJ

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

“Small Conflict”: How Trump’s Hiroshima Remark Reveals the Soul of American Empire

Donald Trump’s recent visit to Japan offered more than diplomatic theater—it revealed the unvarnished ideology of American power. Standing on soil still haunted by nuclear annihilation, he described the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a “small conflict.” Two cities erased, more than 200,000 lives extinguished, generations deformed—all reduced to a footnote in Trump’s story of American triumph.

Trivializing Mass Death
The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a “conflict.” They were a cataclysm. People evaporated into shadows on shattered walls. Survivors suffered for decades from cancers, birth defects, and trauma. Yet for Trump, this horror is not a moral lesson—it is a management model. He sees Japan’s surrender not as a humanitarian tragedy, but as a success story in the “art of the deal”: destroy enough lives, and you can control a nation.

Mushroom cloud Stock Photos, Royalty Free Mushroom cloud Images | DepositPhotos
August 6, 1945, when the nuclear bomb struck Hiroshima, shadows instantly imprinted on concrete walls and pavement, leaving a marker of those instantly killed by vaporizing at ground zero

The Blood-Stained Legacy Trump Inherits
Trump is not an exception to American foreign policy—he is its bluntest expression. From the genocide of Native Americans to the chemical warfare in Vietnam, from backing Saddam Hussein to destroying Libya, from occupying Iraq and Afghanistan to arming the genocide in Gaza—the pattern is consistent. American security has been built on the insecurity of others. Trump’s Hiroshima comment lays bare the calculus: human life is collateral in the pursuit of power.

American security has been built on the insecurity of others. Trump’s Hiroshima comment lays bare the calculus: human life is collateral in the pursuit of power.

Peace Through Domination
Trump poses as a peacemaker, but his peace is the peace of the graveyard. He celebrates the U.S.-written Japanese constitution and the ongoing U.S. military presence not as partnerships, but as trophies of submission. His “peace” means surrender; his “deal” is made with the blood of nameless, faceless people—in Gaza, in Ukraine, in Yemen. This is the logic of empire, where war is not a failure, but a business.

A U.S. soldier honoring before Japan’s Peace Memorial—irony in one frame

The Urgent Need for a New International Order
We cannot rely on a system that allows such crimes to be called “small.” The United Nations, international law, and human rights institutions have repeatedly failed to hold the U.S. and its allies accountable. A new, multipolar order must arise—one built not on imperial domination, but on mutual sovereignty and collective resistance.

Nations that have invested in unity and self-reliance—like Iran during the Sacred Defense—have shown that it is possible to force empires to retreat. In a world where “small conflicts” include nuclear genocide, independent nations must form a front of deterrence. Power, not pleas, is the only language empires understand.

In a world where “small conflicts” include nuclear genocide, independent nations must form a front of deterrence. Power, not pleas, is the only language empires understand.

Conclusion: From Hiroshima to Gaza—The Empire Has Not Changed
Trump’s remark was no slip of the tongue. It was a confession. The same thinking that vaporized Hiroshima now fuels the F-35s over Gaza. The same indifference to human suffering that shrugged at Nagasaki today supplies the bombs falling on Rafah.

If we do not build a world beyond American hegemony, the “small conflicts” of tomorrow will be even deadlier. The warning of Hiroshima was meant for all humanity. Trump has shown us: America never learned it.

It's time to accept that Donald Trump is never going to learn basic stuff  about the world | Vox

It’s time to accept that Donald Trump is never going to learn basic stuff about the world…

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

Peacemaker or Partner in Crime? Trump’s Failed Gaza Ceasefire Theater

Donald Trump’s recent visit to West Asia, intended to showcase his role in facilitating a Gaza ceasefire, revealed more about his political desperation than diplomatic achievement. What was billed as a victory tour instead exposed strategic failure and moral bankruptcy.Peacemaker or partner in Netanyahu's failure

The Unwelcome Mediator
Trump’s attempt to position himself as a peacemaker was met with widespread rejection. The protocol-bound airport receptions couldn’t conceal the stark reality: nobody sees Trump as an impartial mediator. His historical alignment with Israeli extremism and his administration’s record of escalating tensions made his peacemaker pose implausible to regional actors and international observers alike.

The Newyorker:

Late on Wednesday evening, in a social-media post, Trump finally had something to truly trumpet: “I am very proud to announce that Israel and Hamas have both signed off on the first Phase of our Peace Plan,” he wrote just after 7 P.M. “BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS!”

The ceasefire deal, brokered with the help of America’s Arab allies, such as Qatar and Egypt, calls for Israel to stop fighting within twenty-four hours and to partially withdraw from Gaza, and for Hamas to release by early next week all twenty Israeli hostages presumed to still be alive two years after they were taken during Hamas’s October 7th terrorist attack. At a Cabinet meeting on Thursday, as advisers made plans for Trump to fly to the region on Sunday night for a signing ceremony, the President touted his “momentous breakthrough.”

Strategic Goals Abandoned
The ceasefire terms tell a story of failed objectives. What began as a mission to destroy Hamas and return Israeli prisoners without concessions ended as a negotiated exchange of prisoners with humanitarian provisions. This fundamental deviation from maximalist goals represents not compromise but capitulation—a clear admission that initial assumptions about quick military victory were fatally flawed.

Accountability for Carnage
We cannot discuss Trump’s ceasefire role without acknowledging his responsibility for the violence preceding it. With nearly 70,000 Palestinians killed, Trump must be recognized as Netanyahu’s primary partner in this humanitarian catastrophe. His policies—recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, endorsing settlement expansion, and providing unconditional military support—created the conditions for this slaughter.

The New Yorker:

On Thursday, the Israeli Cabinet was on the verge of approving the initial stages of a ceasefire agreement that will at least temporarily end the war in Gaza. That war, which began two years ago with the Hamas attacks of October 7th, and the killing of 1,200 people, was followed by Israel’s bombardment and occupation of the Gaza Strip, and the killing of nearly 70,000 Palestinians. (A United Nations commission recently labeled Israel’s war a genocide.) The initial phases of the agreement, which President Trump announced on Wednesday, will likely include a release of the remaining Israeli hostages early next week, a release of Palestinians held by Israel, a pullback of Israeli troops from Gaza, and a much-needed surge of food and medicine into the territory.
Even with the ceasefire deal, “I don’t know that Gaza is even a place where humans can continue to live in any meaningful way,” Khaled Elgindy, an expert on the Middle East, said.”Almost everything has been destroyed. There’s almost nothing left, even of Gaza City. All the hospitals are basically not functioning. There are no universities. There are no schools. There are no roads. There’s no sewage-treatment plants, and there’s no infrastructure. Everything has been destroyed. . . . It makes me incredibly sad to say that, because we’re talking about a society of two million people. Gaza City is the largest city in Palestine. It’s one of the oldest places on earth. There’s just so much that has been lost. Beyond just the basic immediate subsistence, can Gaza survive? I don’t know.” In an interview with Isaac Chotiner, Elgindy discusses the contours of the peace deal and what will come next: https://newyorkermag.visitlink.me/kiRFvz

The Political Cost of Failure
Trump’s transactional approach to foreign policy has backfired spectacularly. Rather than enhancing his stature, the Gaza crisis has increased global antipathy toward American leadership and alienated young voters concerned with human rights. The very tools Trump relied on—unilateral pressure and disregard for international law—have undermined his credibility when he most needs it.

A Fragile Future
The current ceasefire represents at best a temporary pause in an ongoing conflict. Fundamental questions about Gaza’s governance, reconstruction, and political future remain unanswered. Without a comprehensive political solution, this ceasefire merely sets the stage for the next round of violence—and Trump has demonstrated he lacks the vision or credibility to help achieve one.

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail

Posted on Leave a comment

Negotiation is Code for Terror: How Israel & Trump Turn Diplomacy into Assassination

From Beirut to Doha, a five-point pattern reveals how ‘ceasefire talks’ became the ultimate trap for tracking and killing high-value targets.

1. The Deadly Pattern: “Diplomacy” as a Weapon 

  • The Strategy: Israel and the US use negotiation proposals to:
    • Lull targets into a false sense of security.
    • Gather intelligence on locations and movements.
    • Execute precision strikes during “ceasefires.”
  • Key Players:

2. The Five Cases: From Beirut to Tehran

Case 1: The Beirut Betrayal (July 2024)

Case 2: The Ceasefire Trap (September 2024)

Case 3: The Hostage Deception (2024)

Case 4: The Nuclear Negotiation Ambush (June 2025)

Case 5: The Doha Double-Cross (2025)

  • The Hook: Trump proposes ceasefire, urges Hamas to “accept.”
  • The Strike: Airstrike on Hamas political office in Doha, killing senior official Khalil al-Hiya.
  • Trump’s Role: Publicly warned Hamas two days earlier, signaling the attack.

3. The Architects: Trump-Netanyahu Coordination

  • Trump’s Role:
  • Netanyahu’s Role:
    • Uses diplomacy to lower guard of adversaries.
    • Times strikes to coincide with “peace” initiatives.

4. The Aftermath: Trust in Diplomacy Destroyed

  • No More Ceasefires: Resistance groups now view talks as death traps.
  • Global Implications:
    • Undermines UN/EU mediation efforts.
    • Validates “resistance through force” narratives.
  • Legacy: “Negotiation” is now synonymous with treachery and terror.

Call to Action

*”Share this investigation. Tag the UN, ICC, and human rights groups. Demand:

  • Formal condemnation of state-sponsored assassination under diplomatic cover.
  • Sanctions on officials involved in these operations.
  • A halt to all US-Israel “mediation” until verified by neutral parties.

#NegotiationIsTerror #DiplomaticAssassination #StopUSIsraelTerror”*

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

The Weaponization of Desire: How Israel Uses Female Soldiers to Whitewash Genocide

When bombs and bullets aren’t enough to control the narrative, the Israeli regime has turned to a more ancient tool of manipulation: sex appeal. This is the story of a state using women’s bodies to sanitize a massacre.

The Pinkwashing Playbook

As the world recoils at images of dismembered children in Gaza, another, more insidious campaign is flooding social media: smiling, heavily armed Israeli female soldiers in revealing uniforms, dancing suggestively, or posing provocatively next to military hardware.

Image 1: Israel Army Girls: Stunning Israeli Female Soldiers in Action

This is not a coincidence. It is a calculated strategy of military-grade pinkwashing designed to divert global outrage from war crimes to lust. And it is orchestrated from the highest levels of the Israeli government.

Image 2: Israel using pinkwashing to cover up actions against Palestinians.

1. The Official Strategy: From War Crimes to “Like” Crimes

Image 3: From war crimes to like crimes

According to investigative reports from MintPress News and Al Jazeera, this is not organic behavior. It is a cabinet-approved strategy.

  • The Goal: To manipulate public opinion, particularly young Western men, by replacing anger with arousal.

  • The Quote: David Dorfman, a media consultant for the Israeli consulate in the U.S., explicitly stated: “Men at this age have no feelings for Israel, and we consider this a problem, so we came up with an idea to attract them.”

  • The Method: A vast network of social media accounts, both official and “personal,” pushing sexualized content alongside pro-Israel messaging.

This is psychological warfare, and the battlefield is your Instagram feed.

2. The Soldiers of Seduction: Case Studies in Propaganda

Image 4: The Romanticisation of Israel Defense Forces’ Female Soldiers

Meet Natalia Fadeev. One of many Israeli soldiers with millions of followers. Her content is a masterclass in cognitive dissonance:

  • Posts: Provocative images in uniform or with weapons.

  • Captions: Virulently anti-Muslim rhetoric like “we are going to capture some Muslims” coupled with innocent questions like “look me in the eyes, do you really think I can commit war crimes?”

The formula is simple: use a pretty face to make monstrous policies palatable.

3. Obituaries in Bikinis: The Depravity of Death Marketing 

The sexualization is so pervasive it now extends to death announcements. Well-known Israeli media outlets have published obituaries for fallen female soldiers using salacious, pre-death photos of them in bikinis or revealing clothing—not in respectful remembrance, but to generate engagement and sympathy through titillation.

This is the ultimate reduction of a human being to a propaganda tool, even in death.

Image 5: Just behind the doors

4. The American Puppets: Celebrities and Free Trips

The machine extends beyond borders. The Israeli government has:

  • Funded Propaganda Trips: Inviting American celebrities like comedian Conan O’Brien and actress Hailee Steinfeld to film light-hearted segments training with female soldiers, completely erasing the context of occupation.

     

    Image 6: sraeli Deffence FB post: we are unstoppable
  • Organized “Birthright” Sex Trips: Free trips for young Diaspora Jews, where “mating” with soldiers is encouraged to foster emotional loyalty. Studies funded by the Israeli government show this increases support for its policies by 160%. Netanyahu has allocated over $100 million to this program.

    Image 7: Young Jewish adults participate in a free 10-day trip to Israel through Birthright. (courtesy)

It is a state-sponsored strategy of using intimacy as a tool for radicalization.


5. Dating Apps: The Final Frontier of Propaganda

The strategy has infiltrated dating apps. Over a third of Israeli profiles on platforms like Tinder feature men and women in military uniform.

  • They pose smiling in front of bombed-out Gazan buildings.

    Image 8: smiling proudly in front of the Palestinians’ homes he destroyed in Gaza
  • Image 9: Israeli soldiers are engaged in immoral activities such as property theft and looting during raids on Palestinian civilian homes

    They show off stolen Palestinian property as trophies.

  • They desecrate mosques and brag about it.

    Image 10: IDF raiding Al-Aqsa mosque today while Palestinians were attending the Adha holiday prayer today harming women and children.

This is the normalization of genocide, repackaged as flirtation.

Conclusion: A Strategy of Desperation

Despite the scale of this operation, it is failing. The world is not easily fooled. The stench of death from Gaza overwhelms the cheap perfume of this propaganda.

 

Image 11: The stench of death from Gaza overwhelms the cheap perfume of this propaganda.

But its existence reveals a profound truth: the Israeli regime knows its actions are indefensible. When you cannot win the argument with facts, you must distract with fantasy.

 

Image 12: If they stop killing, their own existence would be questioned

They have turned their military into a pornography of power, hoping the world would be too aroused to notice the blood on their hands.

Image 13: The Hebrew in the top right translates as, “Eden Arberjil’s photos – army…the best time of my life.”

 

 

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail