Posted on Leave a comment

The American Playbook: How the US Engineered Imran Khan’s Ouster to Control South Asia

Leaked cables reveal Washington pressured Pakistan to remove its prime minister for pursuing independence. This isn’t diplomacy—it’s imperial manipulation.

When Imran Khan visited Moscow on the very day Russia invaded Ukraine, it wasn’t just a diplomatic snub to Washington—it was an act of defiance. For that, he would pay the ultimate political price. Recently leaked diplomatic cables confirm what many suspected: the United States pressured Pakistani officials in 2022 to remove their prime minister. Within months, Khan was out of office, then arrested, while Pakistan signed a new defense agreement with the United States. This isn’t coincidence—it’s the modern imperial playbook in action.

The Coup That Wasn’t Secret
The leaked cables reveal a systematic campaign to undermine Khan’s government. Why? His foreign policy vision directly challenged American hegemony. While previous Pakistani leaders had balanced between Washington and Beijing, Khan unequivocally pivoted toward China and Russia. He embraced China’ Belt and Road Initiative, pursued energy deals with Moscow, and most provocatively, maintained Pakistan’s neutrality in the Ukraine conflict—a stance Washington viewed as alignment with its adversaries.

Khan’s removal followed a familiar pattern: political instability engineered, a pliable successor installed, and then—crucially—a new defense pact signed that locked Pakistan deeper into America’s security architecture. The entire operation took less than a year.

This document, known as a cipher, is a clandestine piece of correspondence that has now emerged as a focal point within Pakistan’s political landscape due to the tumultuous removal of Prime Minister Imran Khan.

In a development that has sent shockwaves through Pakistan’s political sphere, The Intercept, an American news organization, has unveiled a copy of the notorious cipher. This document sheds light on what the publication describes as unequivocal interference, vested interests, and the active role played by the United States in orchestrating the downfall of Prime Minister Imran Khan’s government. The news agency claims that Imran Khan’s foreign policy goals were the main reason behind his ouster, for example strengthening bilateral relations with China and Russia.

The Great Game 2.0: Playing India Against Pakistan
Washington’s strategy in South Asia is a masterclass in “divide and rule.” On one hand, the US cultivates India as a counterweight to China, supplying advanced weapons and intelligence. On the other, it maintains Pakistan as a check on Indian power—a nuclear-armed rival that ensures Delhi never becomes too independent.

This balancing act serves multiple purposes:

  • It keeps both nations dependent on American military equipment

  • It prevents the emergence of a united South Asian bloc

  • It ensures Washington remains the ultimate arbiter of regional disputes

The US doesn’t want India to win—it wants both countries to remain perpetually engaged in managed conflict, forever needing American mediation.

India and pakistan flag print screen on paw chess.now both countries have  economic tariff trade war and patriotic conflict. | Premium Photo
Washington’s strategy in South Asia is a masterclass in “divide and rule.” On one hand, the US cultivates India as a counterweight to China, supplying advanced weapons and intelligence. On the other, it maintains Pakistan as a check on Indian power—a nuclear-armed rival that ensures Delhi never becomes too independent.

Pakistan’s Strategic Value: More Than Just Real Estate
With over 200 million people and nuclear weapons, Pakistan represents the ultimate “swing state” in Asia. Its location offers access to Central Asia, the Middle East, and critically—the Indian Ocean. China recognized this years ago, investing heavily in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. The US now seeks to counter that influence by drawing Pakistan back into its orbit.

But Washington’s interest isn’t in Pakistan’s development—it’s in Pakistan’s utility. As one analyst noted, “The US wants to have its cake and eat it too: use India against China, while using Pakistan against India.”

CHINA PAKISTAN ECONOMIC CORRIDOR (CPEC): THE MARITIME-STRATEGIC DIMENSION
CHINA PAKISTAN ECONOMIC CORRIDOR (CPEC): THE MARITIME-STRATEGIC DIMENSION
US Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East | ASP American Security  Project
US Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East | ASP American Security Project

The Inevitable Next Target
If the US succeeds in containing China, India will inevitably become Washington’s next “problem.” A nation of 1.4 billion people with its own civilizational ambitions cannot permanently serve as another country’s lieutenant. American strategists understand this—which is why they work to ensure no regional power becomes strong enough to challenge US primacy.

The same playbook used against Pakistan—strengthening neighbors, planting narratives of aggression, economic pressure—will eventually be deployed against India once it outlives its usefulness as a Chinese counterweight.

India Is Trump's Next Tariff Target
“Next Target?”

Conclusion: Sovereignty as the Ultimate Rebellion
Imran Khan’s real crime wasn’t corruption or incompetence—it was asserting Pakistan’s right to an independent foreign policy. In today’s unipolar world, that remains the ultimate rebellion. The leaked cables exposing US interference should serve as a warning to all nations seeking strategic autonomy: Washington still believes it has the right to choose other countries’ leaders. IndependenceIndependence

But the era of American unipolarity is ending. As China rises and regional powers assert themselves, the US will find it increasingly difficult to manipulate nations like chess pieces. The people of South Asia—whether in Islamabad or Delhi—are waking up to the reality that their conflicts often serve interests an ocean away. True sovereignty begins when they recognize the manipulator behind the mediation.

The people of South Asia—whether in Islamabad or Delhi—are waking up to the reality that their conflicts often serve interests an ocean away. True sovereignty begins when they recognize the manipulator behind the mediation.

IndependenceIndependenceIndependenceIndependence

Independence

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

Why is Trump Obsessed with Recapturing Afghanistan’s Bagram Air Base?

The Bagram base, once the heart of the US war in Afghanistan, has re-emerged as a flashpoint in global geopolitics. For Donald Trump, it’s not just a military facility—it’s the key to controlling resources, countering China, and projecting power across Asia. And he’s willing to threaten the Taliban with “bad things” to get it back.

Despite a withdrawal deal signed in Doha in 2020, the former and potential future US president has openly expressed his desire to reoccupy the strategic Bagram Air Base. The Taliban have responded with defiance, vowing to block any return of foreign forces to Afghan soil.

But why is this remote base so important to Washington? The answer lies in four pillars of US imperial strategy: geopolitical positioning, resource theft, regional influence, and overwhelming military capacity.


1. A Front-Row Seat to Contain China

Bagram is more than an Afghan base—it’s a potential US listening post just 500 miles from the Chinese border. In Washington’s new Cold War against Beijing, this proximity is priceless. The base would allow the US to monitor Chinese military activity in Xinjiang, track missile tests, and project power into Central Asia—a region China is integrating through its Belt and Road Initiative.

For a US deep state obsessed with “containing” China, Bagram is the perfect unsinkable aircraft carrier on Beijing’s doorstep.

China manufactures its nuclear weapons deeper within the country, according to nuclear experts, but there is an old nuclear test range at Lop Nur, about 1,200 miles from Bagram.

2. Plundering Afghanistan’s $3 Trillion Mineral Bounty

Beneath Afghanistan’s soil lies one of the world’s last great untapped mineral treasures: an estimated $3 trillion in lithium, copper, gold, iron, and rare earth elements. Afghanistan’s lithium reserves alone rival those of global leaders like Chile and Argentina.

Who controls Bagram controls access to these resources. In the race for green energy dominance, these minerals are not just commodities—they are strategic weapons. The US wants to deny them to China and fuel its own tech and defense industries. This isn’t development; it’s 21st-century colonialism.

3. A Wedge Against Russia, Iran, and Regional Sovereignty

Central Asia is a chessboard where the US, Russia, China, and Iran vie for influence. By re-establishing a fortress in Bagram, Washington aims to:

  • Disrupt regional integration led by China and Russia.

  • Pressure Iran from its eastern flank.

  • Monitor and intimidate Pakistan.

It’s a classic imperial move: plant a military flag to dominate the neighborhood and block the rise of independent power centers.

The spokesperson for Russia’s Foreign Ministry, reacting to Trump’s statements, said that the United States left Afghanistan in a shameful manner.

She added that although Bagram air base is a tempting target, the struggles of the Afghan people against NATO show that they will not give up their national sovereignty.

Maria Zakharova stated: “The Bagram air base, located near Kabul, has been renovated and is undoubtedly considered a tempting target. But Washington knows well that the Afghan people, who fought NATO forces for their freedom, will not abandon their national sovereignty.”

Iran also reacted to Trump’s comments. The Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, citing earlier remarks by Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Foreign Minister of the Islamic Emirate, said that the Emirate is not willing to give Afghanistan’s land to the United States.

Ali Larijani further added that U.S. presence in the region would face resistance and that bombings and military campaigns in the region would be deadly for American soldiers.

He said: “Why should they come? What does it mean that they want to seize Bagram airport? In my view, this issue will not be resolved so easily, and it will also be costly for the Americans themselves. The American people must decide whether they want to constantly hold funerals for their children or not. If they do, then let them come, invade countries, and fight.”

The Islamic Emirate has so far not commented on other countries’ statements about the Bagram air base. However, earlier, Fasihuddin Fitrat, Chief of Staff of the Ministry of Defense, responding to Trump’s remarks, said that any deal over even “one inch” of the country’s land is unacceptable.

Jamil Shirwani, a political analyst, also said on the matter: “They will not come by force and pressure; they don’t have the ability to come, and even they themselves don’t have the demand to re-enter Afghanistan militarily.”

Earlier, China also reacted, stating that fueling tensions and creating confrontation in the region does not have public support. Lin Jian, spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry, stressed that his country respects Afghanistan’s independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.

4. Unmatched Military Capacity for Regional Wars

Bagram isn’t a simple airstrip. It’s a massive war hub with two long runways capable of handling the largest US bombers and cargo planes like the C-5 Galaxy. It served as the central nervous system for the 20-year occupation, and the Pentagon dreams of using it again as a launchpad for interventions across South Asia and the Middle East.

In short, Bagram allows the US to strike fast, far, and with devastating force—anywhere, anytime.

For Washington, the base’s strategic logic is clear. From Bagram, the United States could oversee counterterrorism operations, track regional militancy, and monitor Chinese and Russian activity. But the operational feasibility of returning is slim. Militarily seizing Bagram would mean re-invasion, with all the troop deployments, logistics, and costs that toppled three empires before. Diplomatically, the price would be high: recognition of Taliban rule, lifting of sanctions, or large-scale aid – concessions that are potentially toxic in Washington.

History also cautions against optimism. From the British retreats of the 19th century to the Soviet defeat in the 1980s and the US exit in 2021, foreign powers have learned the same lesson: Afghanistan cannot be held without local consent.

Bagram’s strategic importance is unquestionable, but in Afghan politics, symbols matter as much as runways. For the Taliban, ceding the base would be a humiliation, undermining the sovereignty they fought to reclaim.

Trump’s call, then, seems more rhetorical than practical. It signals a desire to reassert US influence in a region increasingly shaped by Chinese and Russian engagement. It may also be a way of further prodding the record of the Biden administration. But the Taliban’s rejection, coupled with their international backing, makes a negotiated return highly unlikely. The alternative – military force – would be prohibitively costly and politically untenable. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/what-chance-does-trump-have-negotiating-bagram-airbase-deal-taliban


The Cost of Imperial Arrogance

Returning to Bagram would be a catastrophic miscalculation—one that repeats every US failure since 2001.

  • Financial Drain: Billions more taxpayer dollars would be wasted on rebuilding a base only to lose it again.

  • Human Toll: More dead soldiers, more traumatized veterans, and countless more Afghan civilians caught in the crossfire.

  • Political Blowback: Trump campaigned on “America First” and ending endless wars. Reoccupying Bagram would be a naked betrayal of his voters and proof that the war machine controls US policy, no matter who is president.

The American people are tired of war. The Taliban will not surrender sovereignty. And the world is watching—no one is buying Washington’s lies anymore.

Timeline: The U.S. War in Afghanistan Taliban soldiers sit on tank on the outskirts of Kabul.


twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail

Posted on Leave a comment

“Drug War” or Oil War? The Real Reason US Warships Are Heading to Venezuela

Washington’s hypocrisy is on full display: sending destroyers to “fight drugs” while actively starving a nation and plotting regime change over the world’s largest oil reserves, this time Venezuela.

Image 1: US warships carrying over 2,500 Marines heading toward Venezuela may arrive as early as this week

1. The “Anti-Drug” Mission: A Classic US Pretext

The United States has announced it is sending three warships toward Venezuelan waters under the guise of combating “narco-terrorism.” This is not a new script.

We’ve seen this before:

  • Iraq 2003: “Weapons of Mass Destruction”

  • Libya 2011: “Protecting Civilians”

    Image 2: The United States has deployed to support for Libya’s people of freedom and their prosperity to continue in secure manner: a naval force of 11 ships, including the amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge, the amphibious transport dock USS Ponce, the guided-missile destroyers USS Barry and USS Stout, the nuclear attack submarines USS Providence and USS Scranton, the cruise missile submarine USS Florida and the amphibious command ship USS Mount Whitney. Additionally, B-2 stealth bombers, AV-8B Harrier II ground-attack aircraft, EA-18 and F-15 and F-16 fighters have been involved in action over Libya.U-2 reconnaissance aircraft are stationed on Cyprus. On 18 March, two AC-130Us arrived at RAF Mildenhall as well as additional tanker aircraft. On 24 March 2 E-8Cs operated from Naval Station Rota Spain, which indicates an increase of ground attacks. The Following map shows where the location that Pro-Gaddafi forces controlled and where the place controled by anti-Gaddafi forces: Source: wikipedia
  • Syria: “Fighting Terrorism”

    Image 3: We will maintain our mission in northeast Syria: US – North press agency

Now, Venezuela is the next target—and the excuse is just as transparent.

The real goal? To destabilize the government of Nicolás Maduro, who Washington refuses to recognize because he dares to prioritize Venezuelan sovereignty over U.S. demands.

2. The Oil in the Room: Why Venezuela Really Matters

Venezuela holds the largest proven oil reserves on the planet. That is not a coincidence—it is the reason.

Image 4: Venezuela is the biggest oil reserves in the world with its 304 billion barrels.

The U.S. does not intervene in:

  • Real drug hubs in Honduras or Guatemala

    Image 5: Narcotrafficking network in Honduras
  • Actual dictatorships like Saudi Arabia

    Image 6: Call them ‘Dictators’, not ‘Kings’

It intervenes where strategic resources are at stake. The playbook is simple:

  1. Sanction the country into economic crisis.

  2. Fund opposition movements and call them “the real government.”

  3. Create humanitarian chaos.

  4. Invade or orchestrate coup under a “humanitarian” or “anti-drug” pretext.

It’s regime change 101.

3. The “Guaidó Project”: A Failed Puppet

Image 6: Left to right: coup leader Juan Guaidó, Colombian President Iván Duque and Vice President Mike Pence

For years, the U.S. backed Juan Guaidó—a man who never won a national election—as the “legitimate” president of Venezuela. The goal was to create a parallel government willing to hand over Venezuela’s oil to U.S. corporations.

The plan failed. Guaidó had no real domestic support, and the Venezuelan military remained loyal to Maduro.

Image 7: Venezuela Defense Chief Says Troops to Remain Loyal to Maduro

Now, with diplomacy failing, the U.S. is escalating toward military intimidation.

4. Sanctions = Economic Warfare

The U.S. has imposed crushing sanctions on Venezuela:

  • Blocking oil exports

  • Freezing foreign assets

  • Limiting food and medicine imports

These are not “targeted” sanctions. They are collective punishment designed to make the population suffer until they overthrow their own government.

The result? The richest country in oil is now one of the poorest in stability—by U.S. design.

Image 8: Venezuela indeed should be paradise, but because of the US sanctions the total poverty exceeded 87% in 2017

5. What’s Next: Syria in Latin America?

If the U.S. succeeds in triggering unrest, Venezuela could descend into a proxy war:

  • US-backed factions vs. government loyalists

  • Destabilized region: Colombia and Brazil may be drawn in

  • Mass refugee crises

  • Another generation lost to war

All while the U.S. positions itself to control the oil.

Image 9: Why is oil in Venezuela a responsibility of USA

6. The Real Drug Lords

While the U.S. claims to fight drugs, it ignores that the largest drug consumer market is in the United States. The real “narco-terrorism” is fueled by American demand and American banks that launder drug money.

This isn’t about drugs. It’s about domination.

 

 

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail