Posted on Leave a comment

The Scramble for Sudan: How Foreign Powers Are Fueling Africa’s Silent Genocide

Sudan is bleeding. Since April 2023, a brutal civil war has pitted the Sudanese Armed Forces, led by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, against the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a militia with roots in the Janjaweed, responsible for the Darfur genocide two decades ago. The fall of El Fasher—the capital of North Darfur—on October 26, 2025, marks a grim turning point. But this is not just a Sudanese conflict. It is a proxy war, fueled by foreign money, weapons, and ambition.

The Fall of El Fasher: A City of Suffering
For 18 months, El Fasher was under siege. Then it fell—quickly, brutally. In the first 72 hours, more than 1,500 civilians were killed. Most were from the Masalit tribe, targeted in what survivors describe as systematic ethnic cleansing. Hospitals were bombed, medical staff kidnapped, homes burned. Mass graves dot the outskirts. Those who escaped describe a city of ghosts—a place where the atrocities of the 2000s have returned, this time with more sophisticated weapons and even less global attention.

War in Sudan: Death strikes at every corner in devastated Khartoum
War in Sudan: Death strikes at every corner in devastated Khartoum

Foreign Hands on Sudanese Soil
Behind the RSF’s brutal efficiency lies the shadow of the United Arab Emirates. Multiple reports confirm the UAE has supplied the militia with armored vehicles, drones, and small arms. Why? For gold. For the Red Sea port of Suakin. For regional influence. By backing the RSF, the UAE secures access to Sudan’s vast mineral wealth while undermining the official government in Khartoum. This is not aid—it is outsourcing war. And the world has responded with little more than statements of concern.

UK military equipment used by militia accused of genocide found in Sudan,  UN told | Global development | The Guardian
UK military equipment used by militia accused of genocide found in Sudan, UN told

A War Waged on the Helpless
The numbers are staggering, almost beyond comprehension:

  • Over 20,000 dead

  • 13 million displaced—one of the largest internal displacement crises in the world

  • 30 million in need of humanitarian aid

  • 25 million facing severe hunger

In Darfur, the RSF uses starvation as a tactic. Roads are blocked. Aid convoys are turned back. The result is a man-made famine in a land that was once the breadbasket of the region.

Over 25 million people face hunger in Sudan - Hobe News
Over 25 million people face hunger in Sudan

The World Watches—and Waits
International responses have been slow, fragmented, and painfully inadequate. The UN condemns. The African Union deliberates. The EU issues statements. The US sanctions a few RSF commanders. But no one has stopped the flow of weapons. No one has intervened to protect civilians. In the age of live-streamed wars, Sudan’s suffering remains strangely invisible—a silence that suits those who profit from the chaos.

Is Peace Possible?
There are roads to peace, but they are littered with obstacles:

  • ceasefire that integrates the RSF into the national army

  • transitional government that includes civilian voices

  • National reconciliation that addresses decades of trauma

But none of this will happen as long as foreign powers treat Sudan as a chessboard. The UAE must end its support for the RSF. The international community must enforce an arms embargo. And Sudan’s leaders—military and civilian—must choose the nation over their own power.

Fires inside a WFP compound in El Fasher

Conclusion: We Have Been Here Before
Two decades ago, the world vowed “never again” after Darfur. Today, we are watching “again” unfold in real time. The fall of El Fasher is not just the loss of a city. It is the failure of humanity. But within Sudan, there is still resistance—local committees documenting crimes, doctors working without supplies, ordinary people sharing what little they have. Their courage is a flicker of light in a very dark night. It is time the world learned to see by it.

Altuma’s children are playing inside their shelter. Displaced by the conflict from their home in Khartoum, the family has had to move several times and is currently living in an old building without a roof over its head

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

The Nimbus Project: How Google & Amazon Built a “Get Out of Court Free” Card for Israel’s Genocide

Silicon Valley has long claimed it exists to “organize the world’s information” and “be Earth’s most customer-centric company.” But a groundbreaking investigation reveals a darker mission: helping a nuclear-armed state evade justice for genocide.

A joint report by The Guardian, the Israeli magazine *+972*, and the Hebrew-language outlet Local Call exposes the $1.2 billion Nimbus Project—a secretive contract between the Israeli government, Google, and Amazon. Buried in the fine print is a “flashing mechanism,” a coded alert system designed to tip off Israel about international legal requests. The goal? To give the regime time to block subpoenas and escape accountability for war crimes in Gaza.

The “Flashing Mechanism”: A Digital Lockpick for the Law
Under the Nimbus agreement, if a European or American court issues a request for data related to Israeli military or intelligence activities, Google and Amazon are contractually obliged to secretly notify Israel first. The regime can then use this advance warning to legally challenge or politically pressure the requesting country—before the subpoena is even served.

American legal experts call this a “dangerous hoax” that violates the spirit of U.S. law, where judicial orders are meant to be confidential. It’s not innovation; it’s obstruction of justice, coded in algorithms and hosted in the cloud.

Google employees are accusing the company of aiding Israel's war on Gaza through its involvement in Project Nimbus. ⁣ ⁣ Project Nimbus is a $1.2 billion contract with Israel in which Google
Project Nimbus is a $1.2 billion contract with Israel in which Google and Amazon supply cloud computing services to the country’s government and military. ⁣ ⁣

Why Israel Demanded This Clause—And Why Tech Giants Obliged
The report states that Israeli officials insisted on this mechanism fearing “pressure from employees or shareholders” to cut ties over human rights violations. In other words, Google and Amazon knew their partnership with Israel was so morally fraught that their own workforce might revolt. Their solution? Not to end the partnership, but to hide it behind legal firewalls.

The Nimbus Project was never just about cloud storage or AI tools. It was designed from the start to protect Israel from “potential litigation in Europe or the United States for the use of technology in occupation or espionage.” When Israel bombs a hospital, tracks Palestinians for arrest, or runs military-run A.I. targeting systems like “Lavender,” it relies on the same tech infrastructure that Google and Amazon provide—and the same legal escape hatch they helped build.

When Israel bombs a hospital, tracks Palestinians for arrest, or runs military-run A.I. targeting systems like “Lavender,” it relies on the same tech infrastructure that Google and Amazon provide—and the same legal escape hatch they helped build.

Silicon Valley’s Complicity in Genocide
This is not neutral technology. This is weaponized infrastructure. By custom-building tools to help a state evade legal consequences, Google and Amazon have moved from passive providers to active enablers of atrocity. They are not just profiting from genocide—they are ensuring it remains unpunished.

When you use Google Search or Amazon Web Services, you are now indirectly funding a system designed to protect war criminals. Your data, your subscriptions, and your trust are being leveraged to undermine international law.

Bomb Gaza' game pulled from Google Play store after outrage - National |  Globalnews.ca
Google and Amazon are not just profiting from genocide—they are ensuring it remains unpunished.

The Fight for Accountability Isn’t Over—It’s Being Hackedd
The Nimbus Project reveals a terrifying new front in the struggle for justice: the digital silencing of legal mechanisms. If a state can be alerted every time a court tries to hold it accountable, what remains of international law? If Silicon Valley sells sovereignty to the highest bidder, what remains of global order?

But this is not the end. It is a call to action. Employees at Google and Amazon have previously protested their companies’ work with the Israeli military. This investigation must fuel that fire. Consumers, too, have power—to boycott, to raise awareness, to demand that their tech be tools of liberation, not genocide.

If a state can be alerted every time a court tries to hold it accountable, what remains of international law? If Silicon Valley sells sovereignty to the highest bidder, what remains of global order?

Conclusion: We See the Cloud—Now We Must Storm It
Google and Amazon did not expect this story to get out. They built the Nimbus Project in darkness, confident that their algorithms and legal jargon would hide the truth. But the truth is now public.

There are no “neutral platforms.” There are only choices. Google and Amazon have chosen to side with apartheid, occupation, and genocide. The rest of us must choose to stand against them.Company Bosses Draw a Red Line on Office Activists - WSJ

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

“Small Conflict”: How Trump’s Hiroshima Remark Reveals the Soul of American Empire

Donald Trump’s recent visit to Japan offered more than diplomatic theater—it revealed the unvarnished ideology of American power. Standing on soil still haunted by nuclear annihilation, he described the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a “small conflict.” Two cities erased, more than 200,000 lives extinguished, generations deformed—all reduced to a footnote in Trump’s story of American triumph.

Trivializing Mass Death
The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a “conflict.” They were a cataclysm. People evaporated into shadows on shattered walls. Survivors suffered for decades from cancers, birth defects, and trauma. Yet for Trump, this horror is not a moral lesson—it is a management model. He sees Japan’s surrender not as a humanitarian tragedy, but as a success story in the “art of the deal”: destroy enough lives, and you can control a nation.

Mushroom cloud Stock Photos, Royalty Free Mushroom cloud Images | DepositPhotos
August 6, 1945, when the nuclear bomb struck Hiroshima, shadows instantly imprinted on concrete walls and pavement, leaving a marker of those instantly killed by vaporizing at ground zero

The Blood-Stained Legacy Trump Inherits
Trump is not an exception to American foreign policy—he is its bluntest expression. From the genocide of Native Americans to the chemical warfare in Vietnam, from backing Saddam Hussein to destroying Libya, from occupying Iraq and Afghanistan to arming the genocide in Gaza—the pattern is consistent. American security has been built on the insecurity of others. Trump’s Hiroshima comment lays bare the calculus: human life is collateral in the pursuit of power.

American security has been built on the insecurity of others. Trump’s Hiroshima comment lays bare the calculus: human life is collateral in the pursuit of power.

Peace Through Domination
Trump poses as a peacemaker, but his peace is the peace of the graveyard. He celebrates the U.S.-written Japanese constitution and the ongoing U.S. military presence not as partnerships, but as trophies of submission. His “peace” means surrender; his “deal” is made with the blood of nameless, faceless people—in Gaza, in Ukraine, in Yemen. This is the logic of empire, where war is not a failure, but a business.

A U.S. soldier honoring before Japan’s Peace Memorial—irony in one frame

The Urgent Need for a New International Order
We cannot rely on a system that allows such crimes to be called “small.” The United Nations, international law, and human rights institutions have repeatedly failed to hold the U.S. and its allies accountable. A new, multipolar order must arise—one built not on imperial domination, but on mutual sovereignty and collective resistance.

Nations that have invested in unity and self-reliance—like Iran during the Sacred Defense—have shown that it is possible to force empires to retreat. In a world where “small conflicts” include nuclear genocide, independent nations must form a front of deterrence. Power, not pleas, is the only language empires understand.

In a world where “small conflicts” include nuclear genocide, independent nations must form a front of deterrence. Power, not pleas, is the only language empires understand.

Conclusion: From Hiroshima to Gaza—The Empire Has Not Changed
Trump’s remark was no slip of the tongue. It was a confession. The same thinking that vaporized Hiroshima now fuels the F-35s over Gaza. The same indifference to human suffering that shrugged at Nagasaki today supplies the bombs falling on Rafah.

If we do not build a world beyond American hegemony, the “small conflicts” of tomorrow will be even deadlier. The warning of Hiroshima was meant for all humanity. Trump has shown us: America never learned it.

It's time to accept that Donald Trump is never going to learn basic stuff  about the world | Vox

It’s time to accept that Donald Trump is never going to learn basic stuff about the world…

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

Orbán’s Unflinching Truth: Ukraine’s Sovereignty Is an Illusion

In a stark and unapologetic address at the “Peace March,” Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán articulated what many in the West whisper but rarely state aloud: Ukraine has lost its sovereignty. No longer an autonomous nation, its fate now rests in the hands of foreign powers.

The End of Illusion
Orbán declared that Ukraine’s sovereignty is a relic of the past. Its government, military, and economic survival are now dictated by external actors—primarily the United States and European institutions. In his view, Ukraine has become a geopolitical chessboard, where its people’s future is negotiated in distant capitals.

3x5 Ft Ukraine America EU NATO Flag ...
Ukraine’s fate being decided by external powers

Hungary’s Defiant Stand
Rejecting EU pressure to contribute funds, weapons, or troops, Orbán stated plainly: “We will not give our money, our weapons, or our soldiers for Ukraine.” For Hungary, this conflict is not its war, and Orbán refuses to let Brussels drag his nation into a military quagmire that serves others’ interests.

Tens of thousands of people flooded the streets of Budapest on Thursday(Oct. 23.) for the annual Peace March, voicing strong opposition to the European Union’s military policies and growing involvement in the Ukraine conflict.

 

The Real EU Agenda: Partition Under the Guise of Solidarity
While the European Union publicly champions Ukraine’s cause, Orbán revealed a darker reality: behind closed doors, the discussion is not about saving Ukraine, but about carving it up. Billions in aid are not acts of charity—they are strategic investments in influence and control. The conflict, far from a tragedy, is seen by some as an opportunity for territorial and political reordering.

Flags of Ukraine, the European Union and Russia. Conflict. Ukraine russia conflict illustrations
Is the country vanishing?

 

A Warning to Europe
Orbán’s speech serves as a sobering critique of EU hypocrisy. As Western leaders preach unity and resolve, their actions suggest a willingness to sacrifice Ukrainian sovereignty for broader strategic gains. The Prime Minister’s refusal to participate is not isolationism—it is a rejection of this cynical calculus.

Photo: Vilnius, Lithuania. 12th July, 2023. Rishi Sunak (l-r), Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Joe Biden, President of the United States, Giorgia Meloni, Prime Minister of Italy, and Jens Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General, welcome Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine, at the NATO-Ukraine meeting during the NATO summit. Credit: Kay Nietfeld/dpa/Alamy Live News.
Photo: Vilnius, Lithuania. 12th July, 2023. Rishi Sunak (l-r), Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Joe Biden, President of the United States, Giorgia Meloni, Prime Minister of Italy, and Jens Stoltenberg, NATO (former)Secretary General, welcome Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine, at the NATO-Ukraine meeting during the NATO summit. Credit: Kay Nietfeld/dpa/Alamy Live News.

Conclusion: The Naked Truth
Viktor Orbán has torn away the diplomatic veneer surrounding the Ukraine war. Sovereignty, when sustained by foreign funds and foreign weapons, is sovereignty in name only. As the West pours billions into Ukraine, Orbán’s words remind us: in geopolitics, there are no saviors—only opportunists.

“The situation is clear. The West speaks of defending Ukraine, but in reality, it is an imperialist grab for land, resources, and money. The unfortunate Ukrainian people are being plundered, while those pushing for war cloak exploitation in the guise of protection. Let there be no illusion, this is about power and profit,” Orban said in a post on social media platform X. 
twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

The Great Gaza Illusion: Why the Ceasefire is Doomed to Fail

The fragile ceasefire in Gaza represents less a path to peace than a temporary pause in the inevitable next confrontation. The fundamental disagreements between Israel and Hamas, coupled with unrealistic expectations from international mediators, create a perfect storm for future conflict.

Irreconcilable Positions: Disarmament vs. Resistance
Netanyahu insists on Gaza becoming a “weapon-free zone with permanent security,” demanding complete disarmament of Hamas as a non-negotiable precondition. Meanwhile, Hamas leaders characterize this as “destruction of the ideology of resistance” and have only consented to “temporary deactivation.” This isn’t merely a tactical disagreement but represents fundamentally incompatible worldviews that no ceasefire can bridge.

Left: Benjamin Netanyahu rails against foreign leaders at UN as Donald Trump flags Gaza deal
Right: Hamas leader, Khalil Al-Hayya, in Doha

 

The Body Count Politics
The implementation of the ceasefire’s first phase has already stalled over the issue of prisoner remains. Hamas has returned only 9 of 28 promised bodies, citing the practical challenges of excavating sites destroyed by Israeli bombing. Israel interprets this as bad faith and has responded by limiting humanitarian aid through Rafah crossing. This cycle of accusation and counter-accusation demonstrates how easily logistical challenges become political weapons, undermining the fragile trust needed for lasting peace.

Gaza Rescuers Are Haunted by Voices of Those They Couldn't Save - The New  York Times
Rescuers rushing to the scene of Israeli airstrikes save those who they can, but are forced to leave many behind. “My soul is tired from this war,” one said

 

The Governance Vacuum
The proposed Provisional Committee of Palestinian Technocrats, supervised by Trump’s “Peace Board,” faces legitimacy challenges from all sides. Hamas claims it will withdraw from direct administration while maintaining indirect influence, Israel rejects any role for the Palestinian Authority without significant reforms, and the people of Gaza are largely excluded from these discussions. This administrative vacuum creates ideal conditions for the conflict to reignite.

Hopeless, Starving, and Besieged”: Israel's Forced Displacement of  Palestinians in Gaza | HRW
Hopeless, Starving, and Besieged”: Israel’s Forced Displacement of Palestinians in Gaza

The Reconstruction Mirage
Trump’s vision of Gaza as a “Middle East Riviera” ignores the staggering reality: 50 million tons of debris requiring 20 years to clear and 80 years for comprehensive reconstruction. With Israel maintaining control over borders and materials, and Hamas likely to use reconstruction as political leverage, the rebuilding process itself threatens to become another battlefield.

Donate to Gaza - Gaza Appeal | Islamic Relief UK
Children are starving to death every day in a man-made famine and homes, hospitals, schools and other essential services are now rubble

Conclusion: The Inevitable Next Round
This ceasefire represents not peace but intermission. Without addressing the fundamental power imbalances, political aspirations, and humanitarian needs of Gaza’s population, the current arrangement merely sets the stage for the next, possibly more destructive, confrontation. The illusion of progress may serve short-term political interests in Washington and Tel Aviv, but it comes at the cost of Palestinian lives and regional stability.

More than $50bn needed to rebuild Gaza after Israel’s war on enclave

Researchers conclude that $53.2bn is needed for extensive reconstruction and recovery efforts in Gaza over the next 10 years.

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

Peace Through Power or Peace Through War? The Militarization of Trump’s Doctrine

Introduction: The doctrine of “peace through power” has been a cornerstone of statecraft since the Roman Empire. But under Donald Trump, this historical concept has been reshaped into a tool for aggressive, unilateral action. This analysis argues that Trump’s version of the doctrine has not guaranteed peace but has instead fueled instability, humanitarian crises, and the erosion of international institutions, effectively becoming a doctrine of “peace through war.”

Roman Legionary - World History Encyclopedia
Note: The Roman legionary was a well-trained and disciplined foot soldier, fighting as part of a professional well-organized unit, the legion (Latin: legio), established by the Marian Reforms. While major tactical changes appeared during the final days of the Roman Republic and the early days of the Roman Empire, Roman armor and weapons, albeit with minor adaptations, remained simple.

From Hadrian’s Wall to the Cold War
The roots of “peace through power” run deep. The Roman Emperor Hadrian operationalized it by building his famous wall—a symbol of military strength meant to deter attacks and secure the empire’s borders. In modern times, U.S. leaders like Dwight Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan adopted this logic. Reagan, in particular, brought it to a crescendo during the Cold War, using massive defense budgets and arms superiority as a deterrent against the Soviet Union. The goal was to prevent war through undeniable strength.

President Trump will kick off Army's 250th birthday celebrations Tuesday at Fort Bragg - ABC7 Los Angeles
Trump kicks off Army’s 250th birthday celebrations at Fort Bragg, says he’ll restore base names

The Trump Transformation: From Deterrence to Aggression
Donald Trump has co-opted the phrase “peace through power,” but his application marks a significant shift. His policies have moved beyond deterrence towards what can be called “peace through aggressive military power.” This approach relies on:

  • Maximum Pressure: Severe economic sanctions and embargoes.

  • Military Threats: Overt and covert threats against adversaries.

  • Unilateral Action: Drone strikes and assassinations of key figures, such as Qasem Soleimani.

As Trump himself implied in a speech to the Israeli Knesset, his administration believed that military action (or its threat) was a necessary tool to force outcomes, like a peace agreement. This represents a fundamental change: military power is no longer just a shield for defense, but a sword to impose will.

The Destructive Age of Urban Warfare; or, How to Kill a City and How to Protect It
Note: Combat in urban areas is the most destructive type of warfare imaginable. Densely populated terrain, complex systems of systems that support human life, military weapons not optimized to these conditions, and asymmetric close-quarters battle tactics all make warfare in cities unforgiving for combatants, noncombatants, and cities alike. The unintentional—and at times intentional—destruction of the physical terrain, populations, and infrastructure of cities during combat leave effects that can be felt for generations.

The Cost of Militarism: Five Critical Failures
The real-world consequences of this aggressive doctrine reveal its profound flaws:

  1. It Fuels Instability, Not Security: Rather than preventing conflict, relentless threats and militarism spark arms races and regional tensions, creating a more volatile world.

  2. It Diverts Vital Resources: The trillions spent on expanding an already massive military budget are funds stripped from domestic needs like healthcare, education, and infrastructure, weakening the social fabric at home.

  3. It Erodes American Credibility: Unilateralism and constant threats have alienated traditional allies, weakened multilateral institutions like the UN, and driven some nations closer to America’s competitors.

  4. It Creates Humanitarian Crises: Airstrikes in Yemen, assassinations, and sanctions have resulted in thousands of civilian casualties, painting America as a nation that disregards international law and human rights.

  5. It Embraces Divisive Nationalism: The doctrine is often paired with a rhetoric of extreme nationalism, which deepens social divisions at home and exacerbates cultural and racial tensions abroad.

    Flags Handshake Stock Illustrations – 3,438 Flags Handshake Stock Illustrations, Vectors & Clipart - Dreamstime
    Note: A handshake between nations is a powerful symbol of peace and a commitment to cooperation, with its roots in showing peaceful intentions by demonstrating one is unarmed. While a handshake alone doesn’t guarantee peace, it is a crucial first step in a diplomatic process that can solidify agreements, build trust, and signify the end of conflict. It represents a mutual understanding and a desire for unity and collaboration.

Conclusion: The Need for a New Path
The “doctrine of peace through power” has been implemented under Trump in a way that guarantees the very opposite of peace. By choosing coercion over diplomacy and unilateral force over multilateral cooperation, this approach has damaged global stability and America’s moral standing. The world does not need more militarism. A secure and prosperous future must be built on the foundations of diplomacy, respect for international law, and genuine cooperation. The alternative—a path of endless conflict—is no path to peace at all.

Nationalism is blamed for this century’s wars, but nationalism need not mean militarism. And the nation-state has been the laboratory of liberty.

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail

Posted on Leave a comment

The Price of Complicity: Unmasking America’s Role as a Partner in the Gaza War

Introduction:
The word “peace” has been a constant refrain in American diplomatic statements regarding Gaza. But when examined against the totality of evidence—the financial flows, the arms shipments, and the political support—this claim rings hollow. This article argues that the United States has shed the mantle of a neutral mediator to become an active and essential partner in building Israel’s war machine, directly fueling a conflict that has created a profound humanitarian crisis.

Notes: Military aid for Israel includes missile defense funding starting in 2006, using data from the Congressional Research Service. All other data is from foreignassistance.gov. Aid to Ukraine for fiscal years 2022 to 2024 is reported by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy as being around $16 billion higher than figures from foreignassistance.gov. South Vietnam existed as a country until the end of the Vietnam War in 1975. Data for 2024 is partially reported.

The Foundation of Support: A Long-Standing Partnership
The history of American military and financial aid to Israel is not new, but its scale and intensity during the Gaza war have reached unprecedented levels. Since 1948, the US has been Israel’s primary military patron, with billions of dollars flowing through long-term contracts. This support, often framed as ensuring an ally’s security, has in practice facilitated the continuation of violence and occupation.

This structured support was solidified in agreements like the Obama-era 10-year memorandum, guaranteeing $3.8 billion in annual military aid. However, since October 2023, the US has approved emergency aid packages pushing direct military assistance to at least $17.9 billion, with some estimates suggesting the total, including indirect support, may exceed $30 billion.

US-taxpayers file a historic lawsuit charging Washington with complicity in Gaza genocide - TRT World
Image: no taxes for war and militarism. War tax resisters are taking to the streets to call for an end to genocide and endless war. They are divesting from the taxes that fund war and investing in people, planet, and justice. 

The American Taxpayer: Financing a Distant War
This colossal financial support does not come from a surplus; it is funded directly by American taxpayers. Statistical estimates break this down to a cost of approximately $85 to over $165 per American taxpayer. This expenditure occurs while the United States faces domestic crises in healthcare, education, and infrastructure. The equivalent funds could have provided health insurance for millions of children or hired hundreds of thousands of new teachers, revealing a stark misalignment between public need and policy priorities.

Note: Lockheed Martin is an American aerospace and defense company, formed by a merger of Lockheed Corporation and Martin Marietta in 1995. It is headquartered in North Bethesda, Maryland, and provides innovative solutions for aerospace, defense, and security challenges worldwide. The company’s main business is with the U.S. Department of Defense and federal agencies, but it also has international and commercial sales

 

A displaced family sit in front of their tent in Gaza.
Image: UNICEF/Mohammed Nateel A displaced family sit in front of their tent in Gaza.

 

The War Economy: Who Really Benefits?
A critical question is: who profits from this cycle? A significant portion of US military aid is designed as a subsidy for American defense contractors. Israel is often required to spend the aid on weapons purchased from US companies like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon. This creates a profitable feedback loop where aid money cycles back into the pockets of American corporations, making war a lucrative business for the US’s war-oriented economy.

 

The Human Cost and Shifting Public Opinion
The tragic reality of this support is measured in the devastation in Gaza: thousands dead, hundreds of thousands displaced, and critical infrastructure like hospitals and schools destroyed by American-made bombs. This reality is reshaping American public opinion. Polls show a majority of younger Americans (ages 18-29) oppose continued military aid. Within the American Jewish community, movements like “Jews for Peace” are gaining traction, challenging unconditional support for the Israeli government.

Calls for a Ceasefire Get Little Traction in Congress
Image: Demonstrators on the National Mall in Washington, DC, call for a ceasefire in Israel’s assault on Gaza on October 21st, 2023.

Conclusion: A Partner, Not a Peacemaker
The evidence paints a clear and damning picture. The United States is not a mediator or a pacifist in the Gaza war; it is an active partner. By bankrolling the war machine with taxpayer money and ensuring the flow of arms, America has become complicit in the resulting humanitarian catastrophe. It has abdicated its claim to moral leadership on the world stage. As long as this partnership continues, American talk of “peace” will remain nothing more than a political show, a cover for a policy rooted in conflict.

2+ Thousand Make Peace Not War Royalty-Free Images, Stock Photos & Pictures | Shutterstock

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail

Posted on Leave a comment

Peacemaker or Partner in Crime? Trump’s Failed Gaza Ceasefire Theater

Donald Trump’s recent visit to West Asia, intended to showcase his role in facilitating a Gaza ceasefire, revealed more about his political desperation than diplomatic achievement. What was billed as a victory tour instead exposed strategic failure and moral bankruptcy.Peacemaker or partner in Netanyahu's failure

The Unwelcome Mediator
Trump’s attempt to position himself as a peacemaker was met with widespread rejection. The protocol-bound airport receptions couldn’t conceal the stark reality: nobody sees Trump as an impartial mediator. His historical alignment with Israeli extremism and his administration’s record of escalating tensions made his peacemaker pose implausible to regional actors and international observers alike.

The Newyorker:

Late on Wednesday evening, in a social-media post, Trump finally had something to truly trumpet: “I am very proud to announce that Israel and Hamas have both signed off on the first Phase of our Peace Plan,” he wrote just after 7 P.M. “BLESSED ARE THE PEACEMAKERS!”

The ceasefire deal, brokered with the help of America’s Arab allies, such as Qatar and Egypt, calls for Israel to stop fighting within twenty-four hours and to partially withdraw from Gaza, and for Hamas to release by early next week all twenty Israeli hostages presumed to still be alive two years after they were taken during Hamas’s October 7th terrorist attack. At a Cabinet meeting on Thursday, as advisers made plans for Trump to fly to the region on Sunday night for a signing ceremony, the President touted his “momentous breakthrough.”

Strategic Goals Abandoned
The ceasefire terms tell a story of failed objectives. What began as a mission to destroy Hamas and return Israeli prisoners without concessions ended as a negotiated exchange of prisoners with humanitarian provisions. This fundamental deviation from maximalist goals represents not compromise but capitulation—a clear admission that initial assumptions about quick military victory were fatally flawed.

Accountability for Carnage
We cannot discuss Trump’s ceasefire role without acknowledging his responsibility for the violence preceding it. With nearly 70,000 Palestinians killed, Trump must be recognized as Netanyahu’s primary partner in this humanitarian catastrophe. His policies—recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, endorsing settlement expansion, and providing unconditional military support—created the conditions for this slaughter.

The New Yorker:

On Thursday, the Israeli Cabinet was on the verge of approving the initial stages of a ceasefire agreement that will at least temporarily end the war in Gaza. That war, which began two years ago with the Hamas attacks of October 7th, and the killing of 1,200 people, was followed by Israel’s bombardment and occupation of the Gaza Strip, and the killing of nearly 70,000 Palestinians. (A United Nations commission recently labeled Israel’s war a genocide.) The initial phases of the agreement, which President Trump announced on Wednesday, will likely include a release of the remaining Israeli hostages early next week, a release of Palestinians held by Israel, a pullback of Israeli troops from Gaza, and a much-needed surge of food and medicine into the territory.
Even with the ceasefire deal, “I don’t know that Gaza is even a place where humans can continue to live in any meaningful way,” Khaled Elgindy, an expert on the Middle East, said.”Almost everything has been destroyed. There’s almost nothing left, even of Gaza City. All the hospitals are basically not functioning. There are no universities. There are no schools. There are no roads. There’s no sewage-treatment plants, and there’s no infrastructure. Everything has been destroyed. . . . It makes me incredibly sad to say that, because we’re talking about a society of two million people. Gaza City is the largest city in Palestine. It’s one of the oldest places on earth. There’s just so much that has been lost. Beyond just the basic immediate subsistence, can Gaza survive? I don’t know.” In an interview with Isaac Chotiner, Elgindy discusses the contours of the peace deal and what will come next: https://newyorkermag.visitlink.me/kiRFvz

The Political Cost of Failure
Trump’s transactional approach to foreign policy has backfired spectacularly. Rather than enhancing his stature, the Gaza crisis has increased global antipathy toward American leadership and alienated young voters concerned with human rights. The very tools Trump relied on—unilateral pressure and disregard for international law—have undermined his credibility when he most needs it.

A Fragile Future
The current ceasefire represents at best a temporary pause in an ongoing conflict. Fundamental questions about Gaza’s governance, reconstruction, and political future remain unanswered. Without a comprehensive political solution, this ceasefire merely sets the stage for the next round of violence—and Trump has demonstrated he lacks the vision or credibility to help achieve one.

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail

Posted on Leave a comment

The Drone Provocation: How NATO is Manufacturing a War Climate to Justify Its Failure in Ukraine

From Estonia to Romania, a sudden “wave” of mysterious drones appears. The script is familiar: blame Russia, stoke public fear, and prepare the ground for a wider conflict they can no longer win by proxy.


A Coordinated Campaign of Fear

In the past week, a curious phenomenon has swept across Eastern Europe. Estonia, Poland, Denmark, and Romania have all reported unauthorized drones violating their airspace. In near-unison, officials and media outlets point the finger at Russia.

@10newsau

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has warned we are now witnessing the most destructive arms race in history, as he again appealed for help to stop Russia. His speech to the UN comes as European airports are once again closed due to unauthorised drone sightings, with the Danish Prime Minister pointing the finger at Russia. Follow the link in bio for the full story. #ukraine #russia

♬ original sound – 10 News

Moscow denies it. But in the West, denial is treated as confirmation.

This isn’t a coincidence. It’s a coordinated political strategy. NATO, facing a catastrophic failure of its proxy war in Ukraine, is now actively manufacturing a pre-war climate to salvage its collapsing strategy and justify its existence.

In spring 2022, the West promised Ukraine freedom and democracy, security and prosperity. Today, most freedoms have been compromised under the fog of war. Democratic institutions are overshadowed by external interests and domestic oligarchs. Many national assets have been mortgaged to Western interests for years to come.

Had Ukraine followed the development trajectory, its economy would not be the size of Algeria in 2030. It would be a half-trillion-dollar economy, like Iran or South Africa. Per capita income would be more than 40% higher than today. Economic opportunities might have reversed some of the migration flows back to Ukraine, which would have over 10 million more inhabitants than today.

The proxy war between the US-led West and Russia in Ukraine has proved just as catastrophic as projected in 2022 and thereafter. It has contributed to secular stagnation in the US and particularly in Europe where the misallocation of scarce allocations from welfare to rearmament is compounding a series of cost-of-living crises. Coming at the heel of the global pandemic, the consequent food and energy crises have severely aggravated the challenges of the Global South. And if the war is allowed to fester further, global economic prospects will be penalized even worse.

What happens in Ukraine will not stay in Ukraine. As long as aggressive geopolitics is favored at the expense of proactive international diplomacy, even promising futures can turn into dark wastelands.

The original commentary was published by China-US Focus on August 28, 2025


1. The “Mysterious” Drones: A Too-Convenient Crisis

The timing is impeccable. As Ukraine loses ground and Western support wanes, a wave of unexplained drones suddenly appears over multiple NATO countries.

  • There are no clear photos.

  • There is no concrete evidence.

  • There are only assertions from the same governments that promised us “WMDs in Iraq.”

This is not about security. It is about psychology. It is about making the threat of war feel real and imminent to the European public.

@maxfostercnn

Mystery drones increase crisis level in Denmark. #denmark #drones #europe #airport

♬ original sound – Max Foster | News Journalist


2. The Real Goal: From Proxy War to Direct Confrontation

The West invested everything in a single bet: that Ukraine could cripple Russia. That bet has failed.

  • Hundreds of billions in weapons and aid have vanished into a stalemate.

  • Ukrainian manpower is exhausted.

  • The Russian economy has adapted, not collapsed.

Faced with this reality, the warmongers in Brussels and Washington have only one path left: escalation. By provoking a direct NATO-Russia incident, they create the casus belli needed to intervene openly. Their hope is to drag a reluctant United States, and specifically Donald Trump, into a war they cannot win alone.

The EU-Ukraine Defence Industry Forum took place on Monday, 12 May, in Brussels.
The Forum focused on strengthening defence industrial cooperation between the EU and Ukraine, with the aim of ensuring sustained military support to Ukraine and more effectively addressing its defence and industrial needs.
Investing in Ukraine’s defence is investing in Europe’s security.
Read the press release: europa.eu/!Rj4dKG

3. Brainwashing the Next Generation: “It’s Normal to Talk About War”

The most sinister part of this campaign is its target: children.

In Sweden, authorities are now interviewing schoolchildren about their “readiness for war.” In Denmark, headlines scream that the nation is unprepared, creating a sense of vulnerability and urgency.

This is not preparedness. This is psychological conditioning. They are normalizing the idea of war in the minds of the young, creating a generation that accepts conflict as inevitable. This is how a society is primed for sacrifice.

NATO: The Most Dangerous Organisation on Earth

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation is the only real military bloc in the world – one whose mandate and ambitions stretch far beyond the North Atlantic and, in fact, constitute the greatest threat to world peace.

https://thetricontinental.org/dossier-nato-the-most-dangerous-organisation/


4. The Ultimate Distraction: War as a Political Shield

Back home, European citizens are struggling with a cost-of-living crisis, rampant inflation, and crumbling public services. What better way to distract from domestic failure than to unveil an external enemy?

A population that is fearing for its survival does not question why their heating bills have tripled. A citizenry that is preparing for bunkers does not protest against their declining real wages.

War, or the fear of war, is the perfect smokescreen for incompetent leaders and a failing economic model. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1MimKg8rwV/


5. The Delusion of Victory: Do They Understand What They’re Unleashing?

European leaders, insulated in their Brussels bubble, are playing with existential fire. They speak of war with Russia as if it were a larger version of Ukraine—a conventional conflict with a tidy conclusion.

“The war in Ukraine remains the most central and consequential crisis for Europe’s future…It is not only the destiny of Ukraine that is at stake. It is Europe’s destiny ”— Politico, 24 February 2025.

 

They seem to have forgotten the arsenals of nuclear weapons pointed at their capitals. They are so desperate to maintain their geopolitical relevance that they are risking total destruction. Either they are ignorant of what modern war between nuclear powers means, or they are so intoxicated by power that they believe they will be spared.


The March of Folly 

The drone scare is not a security alert. It is a political weapon. The interviews with children are not educational; they are indoctrination. The calls for preparedness are not prudent; they are a march towards the abyss.

Europe’s leaders, having failed in Ukraine, are now trying to save face by risking a continent-wide war. They are creating an enemy to justify their existence, conditioning their children to die for it, and distracting their populations from the decay at home.

This is not strategy. It is suicide dressed up as policy.

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

Typhoon Tragedy Proves Protesters Right: Philippine Corruption Costs Lives

Typhon ravages the Philippines after demonstrations against lack of climate protection

Thousands of protesters walked the street in Manila because of a corruption case that turned out to be renewed on a day later. 

Protesters on the street in Manila. Here, a flood control project has escalated the anti-corruption tests.

 

The typhoon Ragasa has gradually released his roof in the Philippines and has instead landed in China.

But before leaving the Philippines, it made sure to put its trail.

Several places are affected by extensive floods and power failure, and the authorities have warned about the risk of landslides.

In addition to the damage to home and infrastructure, several have lost their lives, although thousands of people were evacuated before the typhoon hit.

The Philippines, which is extremely vulnerable to natural disasters, is hit annually by about twenty typhoons, but this one hit at a striking time.

The day before, thousands of protesters were on the street to demonstrate against corruption – was upset by a flood control scandal project.

The typhoon Ragasa, the most violent for a long time, has ravaged several areas in the Philippines and left many places flooded and without power.

Several reasons to demonstrate

Although the demonstrations around the Philippines were actually announced as peaceful, chaos broke out in several places in the country’s capital, Manila.

It resulted in clashes with the police where 17 people were arrested for allegedly throwing stones and setting fire to a truck.

– Ordinary citizens are constantly on the border to have had enough, explains a senior researcher at Dignity and professor at the Department of Politics and Society at Aalborg University.

Still, there are two factors that triggered Sunday demonstrations, the researcher says.

The first factor mentioned is the anniversary of the introduction of the state of emergency in 1972, which de facto marked the beginning of Ferdinand Marcos ’ 14-year dictatorship in the Philippines.

– The anniversary was also marked to some extent in the past. But it wasn’t something big. It has grown much bigger after Marco’s jr. has become president. Now it has become an annual criticism of the current president, who was the son of him who did it back then, he said.

On top of that, there was the very concrete corruption case, the second factor that made the more than 100,000 Filipinos walk on the street.

Thousands of protesters are gathered in Manila to demonstrate against corruption.

Here, the government and the office are accused of having had their fingers deep in the pocket of a project aimed at securing the country in the event of flooding.

According to the government itself, since 2023, the project has been to blame for a loss $2 billion, but Greenpeace assesses that the amount is more than eight times as high.

– The greed we see in this corruption scandal reflects the greed of fossil fuel companies that have brought us to this climate crisis, Greenpeace writes about the Philippine government’s climate-driven spending potentially lost due to corruption since 2023.

– It could have been anything, but now it happened to be this case where it turned out to have gone wrong. And it has then helped nourish the whole constant class consciousness that lies in the Philippines.

The president is trying to speak the protesters by mouth

The Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., has tried to mitigate the situation and expressed support for the protests.

“Do you blame them for going out on the street?” he asked journalists at a press conference and continued:

– If I wasn’t president, maybe I’d be out on the street with them. Of course, they are furious. They are angry, I’m angry. We should all be angry, because what is happening is not right.

– The Marcos family is simply a thief number one. That family has stolen so you don’t dream of the – especially the father(accused of plundering as much as $10bn) and father’s wife, Imelda, who had the 3000 shoes, it sounds from the researcher who complements:

– The Philippines is a hugely corrupt country and it is corrupt in a very special way. Because it is guided by some huge political families.

On Transparency International’s corruption index scores the Philippines 33 out of 100 points and thus places itself on a 114th place out of 180 countries.

– The Philippine people are at the same time strongly revolutionary and willing to accept incredible forms of humiliation. And it is all the time on the border between whether they will accept it or not.

A museum employee checks the shoes from the former Philippine first lady Imelda Marcos next to her portraits on display at the Marikina Shoe Museum in Manila

Wave of protests

The demonstrations in the Philippines come on top of a wave of dissatisfaction in parts of South and Southeast Asia.

There is a youth uprising in Asia at all against the part of the elite who just steal and steal

Protesters in Rizal Park, Manila, on 21 September 2025

 

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail