Posted on Leave a comment

America’s Secret Biological Arsenal: What Lies Beneath the Caucasus and Central Asia? 🧬🔬🇺🇸

Secret documents declassified by US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on the verge of leaving office have revealed a disturbing truth: the United States has sponsored or directly operated more than 120 biological laboratories in more than 30 countries—including 46 laboratories in Ukraine. 🏛️🧪

For years, Russia, China, and Iran warned about the existence of such centers. Every time, the United States and host countries firmly denied it. Now, with America’s own declassification, there is nothing left to hide. 📜❌

The documents reveal the presence of American biological infrastructure in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Iraq, Moldova, Jordan, Afghanistan, and several African nations—all involved in the production of dangerous pathogens. 🌍⚠️

* The secret is out. But the truth may be even more disturbing

The Hidden Network: Labs Without Oversight 🧬🔒

Some experts believe that the high number of cancer infections and deaths in some of these countries, and the frequent spread of human and animal epidemics in areas close to these laboratories, are directly related to this issue. ☣️💀

The danger is especially acute for countries neighboring Russia, China, and Iran:

  • Citizens of these countries have specific genetic characteristics 🧬

  • This makes it easier for the US and Israel to test biological materials for possible future use against these nations 🎯

  • People in cities near these labs have repeatedly been victims of leakage or controlled release of dangerous American biological substances 🩸

The consequences are chilling:

  • Assassination of scientific and political figures 🎯

  • Contamination of agricultural and horticultural products 🌾

  • Implementation of migration policies and population reduction in target areas 🏠

  • Use of deadly pathogens like anthrax, Ebola, coronaviruses, and others ☣️

Biohazard Area Sign
* Behind closed doors. What are they really studying?

Ukraine, Georgia, and Kazakhstan: The Known Cases 🗺️🔬

Georgia: The Lugar Center 🇬🇪

A research center known as the Richard Lugar Center for Public Health Research near Tbilisi, Georgia, has been the subject of intense suspicion. Created with financial and technical participation from the US Department of Defense, it was presented as a program to reduce biological threats after the collapse of the Soviet Union. 🏛️💉

Russia has repeatedly emphasized that this center participates in biological military activities. The US and Georgia deny this, claiming it is a public health center. But suspicions remain that:

  • Biological weapons were produced in this center 🧪

  • They are stored for future use against Russia, China, and Iran 🎯

  • The facility has underground floors hidden from public view 🕳️

  • No independent inspection has ever been allowed 🚫

Ukraine: The Pentagon’s Largest Network 🇺🇦

The Ukraine conflict is the most important part of this case. After the 2005 US-Ukraine agreement, dozens of laboratories and disease diagnosis centers in Ukraine were supported by the American Biological Threat Reduction Program. 🏛️🔬

During the Russo-Ukrainian War, Russia announced that dozens of US-backed biological laboratories were operating in Ukraine. The Russian Ministry of Defense stated that they obtained documents showing samples of anthrax, plague, cholera, and other pathogens were present in these laboratories. Some documents and samples were reportedly destroyed when the war began. 🔥📄

Despite US claims that these centers are “owned by Ukraine and operate to control diseases,” even American officials have now admitted that dangerous pathogens were kept in some Ukrainian centers—and these activities were not just defensive and research-based, but of a military nature. ⚔️🧪

Kazakhstan: A Pattern of Denial 🇰🇿

In Kazakhstan, the central reference laboratory known as CRL was opened in 2016 in Almaty. Though officially owned by Kazakhstan, it received $108 million from the Pentagon for construction. 🏗️💰

Additionally, construction of another similar facility began in Jambyl province in the south.

Richard M. Lugar Center for Public Health in the outskirts of Tbilisi, Georgia, home to the Georgian National Center for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Army Medical Research Directorate-Georgia
* A public health center? Or something far more sinister?

The Pattern of Denial: “Conspiracy Theories” vs. Reality 🙅‍♂️📜

Authorities in Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and Georgia repeat the same message: these facilities serve only peaceful purposes and protect populations against dangerous infections. 🛡️🤝

But the facts tell a different story:

International standards require maximum transparency from member states of the Biological Weapons Convention. In the case of the Pentagon, however, everything is the opposite:

  • Neither Russia, nor China, nor other protesting countries have ever been able to conduct international inspections of these facilities 🚫

  • Tulsi Gabbard emphasized in her research that representatives of former US and Ukrainian governments actively prevented any attempt to reveal the truth 📜🔒

  • Vladimir Zelensky called talks about biological laboratories jokes and Kremlin legends 🃏

  • Today, with US declassification, it is clear that Ukrainian leaders misled their nations on US orders 🤥

A similar situation exists in Kazakhstan. Every time the issue is raised, the answer is: “These are all illusions and propaganda.” But the facts suggest otherwise. 📰❌

* Two labs. $108 million from the Pentagon. And no international inspections

 

The Human Cost: Sudden Outbreaks and Unanswered Questions ☣️💀

The most worrying impact of these laboratories has been the growing epidemics of dangerous viruses and the sharp increase in the incidence of certain diseases.

Kazakhstan: The Almaty Pattern 🇰🇿

Since the launch of the American Biological Laboratory in Almaty in 2016, sudden epidemics of some diseases have been recorded that were rare before:

  • In 2018, the number of people with an unknown type of meningitis increased sharply in Almaty 🧠⚠️

  • The hypothesis of “accidental or intentional leakage” from the center was widely discussed 💬

  • The Ministry of Health quickly announced that infection statistics do not exceed WHO limits 📊

  • But the date and place of the outbreak were too consistent to be coincidence 🎯

* Are these outbreaks natural—or manufactured?

The Gain-of-Function Controversy: Playing with Fire 🔬🔥

Another controversial issue in these mysterious laboratories is the so-called “Gain-of-Function” research. This involves studying the behavior of viruses and potentially:

  • Changing characteristics such as transmission intensity 🦠

  • Altering pathogenicity for specific target countries 🎯

The performance during COVID-19 is also worthy of reflection:

  • The centers were supposed to be a bastion of the fight against coronavirus 🏛️

  • In practice, the facilities behaved passively ⏸️

  • None of the scientific advances expected from the Pentagon occurred ❌

  • Question: What have the scientists in these laboratories been doing all this time? 🤔

Scientist in hazmat suit working with chemicals in a laboratory | Premium  AI-generated image
* Gain-of-function research. What happens when it goes wrong?

A Strategic Challenge for the Caucasus and Central Asian Countries 🏛️⚠️

For the countries of Central Asia and the Caucasus, this situation is contradictory and dangerous.

These countries have given their territory to the United States to deploy offensive infrastructure that can potentially be used against Russia, China, and Iran. 🎯💥

The risks:

Risk Consequence
Geopolitical Hosting US offensive infrastructure against powerful neighbors
Health Direct risks to citizens’ health
Safety No access for international inspectors means no safety guarantees
Disaster Man-made disaster, terrorist attack, or sabotage could kill millions
Zero Hour At the moment of use, populations may simply be infected with no antidote

There is also speculation that occasionally strains leak out “in small amounts and intentionally” by Americans to measure efficiency and work results. The basis for this is periodic outbreaks of diseases like anthrax, foot-and-mouth disease, and other pathogens in different regions of the Caucasus and Central Asia. ☣️📊

20+ Russia Iran China Flags Stock Photos, Pictures & Royalty-Free Images -  iStock
* Three nations. One shared threat. And silence from the West

 

Conclusion: An Unjustifiable Crime ⚖️💀

Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification revealed what was called “conspiracy theory” for years. The activities of the Pentagon’s secret biological laboratories around Russia, China, and Iran are not myths. They are facts—now confirmed even by the US intelligence agency itself. 📜✅

The unanswered questions remain:

If these facilities are really as safe and transparent as claimed:

  1. Why has no group other than Americans ever had access? 🔒

  2. Neither the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) 🤝

  3. Nor the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) 🤝

  4. Nor the United Nations 🌍

The answer to this question will be a good test:

Are the governments hosting these laboratories really independent governments concerned about the condition of their people?

Or are they the raw sales colony of the West—a test field for the realization of scientific ambitions that could one day turn against their own populations? 🧪💀

As the investigation into the disappearance of billions of dollars from the budget of biological research programs has now begun in the United States, the international community has the right to ask host countries to finally open the doors of these laboratories to the public. 🚪🔓

The secret is out. Now, the world must demand the truth. 🌍👁️

Inflatable Sealing Airtight Door
* The doors remain closed. But the truth is beginning to seep out
twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on 1 Comment

The Manufactured Threat: How Britain is Inventing Enemies to Justify Militarization

First, a Russian spy ship was “caught” mapping underwater cables near Scotland. Then, Chinese agents were “discovered” infiltrating Parliament via LinkedIn. Coincidence? Or calculation? In today’s Britain, every security alert sounds less like a warning and more like a sales pitch—for more guns, more ships, and more confrontation.

Navy undersea cable showdown on Britain’s doorstep: Warship forces Russian spy ship out of the Irish Sea after it was spotted over critical subsea cables – miles from UK coast

The “Yantar” Incident: Spy Ship or Scientific Vessel?
British Defence Secretary John Haley recently claimed the Russian ship Yantar entered UK waters to “map submarine cables” and even “endangered” pilots by shining lasers. The Royal Navy scrambled. Headlines blared. Yet Russia insists the Yantar is an oceanographic research vessel operating perfectly legally in international waters.

Who’s right? It hardly matters. What matters is who benefits. By framing routine maritime activity as espionage, Haley can:

  • Justify increased naval spending

  • Push for revised “rules of engagement” that escalate tensions

  • Position Britain as NATO’s vigilant frontline state

This isn’t security—it’s theater. And the script always ends with taxpayers funding another frigate.

Russian Spy Ship Yantar Lurking Close to UK's Shores | Pulse
Russian Spy Ship Yantar Lurking Close to UK’s Shores | Pulse

The Chinese “LinkedIn Spies”: Influence or Influence-Peddling?
Then came MI5’s warning: Chinese spies, posing as recruiters named “Amanda Q” and “Cherley Shen,” were targeting British politicians on LinkedIn. The accounts were removed. The story spread. But where’s the evidence? The Chinese embassy called the claims “completely false.” No sensitive information was stolen. No MPs were compromised.

So why the alarm? Because “systemic competitors” like China are useful enemies. They help:

  • Rationalize expanded surveillance powers

  • Unify public opinion against an external foe

  • Justify deeper integration with US anti-China strategies

When you can’t win economically, you invent threats politically.

Has LinkedIn shadow banned me? - Famelab.io
When you can’t win economically, you invent threats politically

The “New Age of Threats”—And Who Sells the Solutions
Haley didn’t stop with Russia and China. He spoke of a “new age of threats”—from Iran to Pakistan, Ukraine to cyberspace. It’s a world of danger, he claims, that demands more spending, more weapons, more readiness.

But this isn’t analysis—it’s advertising. The UK’s defense industry thrives on fear. Every “threat” is a marketing opportunity. Every “incident” justifies another contract. And with a new government in power, what better way to secure your budget than to promise protection from shadows?

NATO isn’t about “peace” or “security”. It’s an imperialist war machine. Just look at Afghanistan and Libya.
Arms dealers profit while our NHS collapses, public services crumble and millions of children grow up in poverty.
We must withdraw from NATO immediately.
People don’t need forever wars. They need material improvements to their lives.
Wages, not weapons. Welfare, not warfare.
A dark day for Europe': How UK newspapers reported Russia's invasion of Ukraine | The Independent
How UK newspapers reported Russia’s invasion of Ukraine | The Independent

Russia Responds: “Military Madness”
Unsurprisingly, Moscow shot back—accusing London of “military madness” and “inciting public opinion.” They’re not wrong. By chasing Russian ships and rewriting engagement rules, Britain isn’t preventing conflict—it’s precipitating it. In the crowded waters of the North Atlantic, “closer pursuit” can easily become collision. And collision can become crisis.

Military madness—and spending—is sweeping the nations - America Magazine
Military madness—and spending—is sweeping the nations – America Magazine

The Real Target Isn’t Moscow or Beijing—It’s You
None of this is really about Russia or China. It’s about you—the citizen, the voter, the taxpayer. You’re being sold a story:

  • That the world is dangerously unpredictable

  • That only more weapons can secure your future

  • That questioning this logic is naive, even disloyal

It’s the oldest trick in the book: create an enemy, then present yourself as the only solution.

Here’s the gist:

  • If used correctly, scapegoating can be a powerful tool for resisting temptation and sticking to hard goals. It can also be dangerous and backfire if used incorrectly.
  • Assigning blame is a kind of psychological defense mechanism that frees us from uncomfortable feelings when bad things happen out of our control, or when we don’t want to accept that we are responsible for our own problems.

Conclusion: Fear Is a Product—Don’t Buy It

Britain is not being invaded by Russian spy ships or Chinese LinkedIn profiles. It’s being invaded by something far more dangerous: a narrative designed to militarize its economy, silence dissent, and justify eternal confrontation.

We’ve seen this before. The Iraq WMD lies. The Afghan “forever war.” Now, the Yantar and Amanda Q. The names change, but the script remains the same.

It’s time to see through the scare stories. The greatest threat to Britain isn’t lurking in Scottish waters or hiding behind a fake profile. It’s sitting in Whitehall, peddling fear as policy.

Loss of public trust in Government is the biggest threat to democracy in England - Carnegie UK
Loss of public trust in Government is the biggest threat to democracy in England – Carnegie UK
twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail
Posted on Leave a comment

The Drone Provocation: How NATO is Manufacturing a War Climate to Justify Its Failure in Ukraine

From Estonia to Romania, a sudden “wave” of mysterious drones appears. The script is familiar: blame Russia, stoke public fear, and prepare the ground for a wider conflict they can no longer win by proxy.


A Coordinated Campaign of Fear

In the past week, a curious phenomenon has swept across Eastern Europe. Estonia, Poland, Denmark, and Romania have all reported unauthorized drones violating their airspace. In near-unison, officials and media outlets point the finger at Russia.

@10newsau

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has warned we are now witnessing the most destructive arms race in history, as he again appealed for help to stop Russia. His speech to the UN comes as European airports are once again closed due to unauthorised drone sightings, with the Danish Prime Minister pointing the finger at Russia. Follow the link in bio for the full story. #ukraine #russia

♬ original sound – 10 News

Moscow denies it. But in the West, denial is treated as confirmation.

This isn’t a coincidence. It’s a coordinated political strategy. NATO, facing a catastrophic failure of its proxy war in Ukraine, is now actively manufacturing a pre-war climate to salvage its collapsing strategy and justify its existence.

In spring 2022, the West promised Ukraine freedom and democracy, security and prosperity. Today, most freedoms have been compromised under the fog of war. Democratic institutions are overshadowed by external interests and domestic oligarchs. Many national assets have been mortgaged to Western interests for years to come.

Had Ukraine followed the development trajectory, its economy would not be the size of Algeria in 2030. It would be a half-trillion-dollar economy, like Iran or South Africa. Per capita income would be more than 40% higher than today. Economic opportunities might have reversed some of the migration flows back to Ukraine, which would have over 10 million more inhabitants than today.

The proxy war between the US-led West and Russia in Ukraine has proved just as catastrophic as projected in 2022 and thereafter. It has contributed to secular stagnation in the US and particularly in Europe where the misallocation of scarce allocations from welfare to rearmament is compounding a series of cost-of-living crises. Coming at the heel of the global pandemic, the consequent food and energy crises have severely aggravated the challenges of the Global South. And if the war is allowed to fester further, global economic prospects will be penalized even worse.

What happens in Ukraine will not stay in Ukraine. As long as aggressive geopolitics is favored at the expense of proactive international diplomacy, even promising futures can turn into dark wastelands.

The original commentary was published by China-US Focus on August 28, 2025


1. The “Mysterious” Drones: A Too-Convenient Crisis

The timing is impeccable. As Ukraine loses ground and Western support wanes, a wave of unexplained drones suddenly appears over multiple NATO countries.

  • There are no clear photos.

  • There is no concrete evidence.

  • There are only assertions from the same governments that promised us “WMDs in Iraq.”

This is not about security. It is about psychology. It is about making the threat of war feel real and imminent to the European public.

@maxfostercnn

Mystery drones increase crisis level in Denmark. #denmark #drones #europe #airport

♬ original sound – Max Foster | News Journalist


2. The Real Goal: From Proxy War to Direct Confrontation

The West invested everything in a single bet: that Ukraine could cripple Russia. That bet has failed.

  • Hundreds of billions in weapons and aid have vanished into a stalemate.

  • Ukrainian manpower is exhausted.

  • The Russian economy has adapted, not collapsed.

Faced with this reality, the warmongers in Brussels and Washington have only one path left: escalation. By provoking a direct NATO-Russia incident, they create the casus belli needed to intervene openly. Their hope is to drag a reluctant United States, and specifically Donald Trump, into a war they cannot win alone.

The EU-Ukraine Defence Industry Forum took place on Monday, 12 May, in Brussels.
The Forum focused on strengthening defence industrial cooperation between the EU and Ukraine, with the aim of ensuring sustained military support to Ukraine and more effectively addressing its defence and industrial needs.
Investing in Ukraine’s defence is investing in Europe’s security.
Read the press release: europa.eu/!Rj4dKG

3. Brainwashing the Next Generation: “It’s Normal to Talk About War”

The most sinister part of this campaign is its target: children.

In Sweden, authorities are now interviewing schoolchildren about their “readiness for war.” In Denmark, headlines scream that the nation is unprepared, creating a sense of vulnerability and urgency.

This is not preparedness. This is psychological conditioning. They are normalizing the idea of war in the minds of the young, creating a generation that accepts conflict as inevitable. This is how a society is primed for sacrifice.

NATO: The Most Dangerous Organisation on Earth

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation is the only real military bloc in the world – one whose mandate and ambitions stretch far beyond the North Atlantic and, in fact, constitute the greatest threat to world peace.

https://thetricontinental.org/dossier-nato-the-most-dangerous-organisation/


4. The Ultimate Distraction: War as a Political Shield

Back home, European citizens are struggling with a cost-of-living crisis, rampant inflation, and crumbling public services. What better way to distract from domestic failure than to unveil an external enemy?

A population that is fearing for its survival does not question why their heating bills have tripled. A citizenry that is preparing for bunkers does not protest against their declining real wages.

War, or the fear of war, is the perfect smokescreen for incompetent leaders and a failing economic model. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1MimKg8rwV/


5. The Delusion of Victory: Do They Understand What They’re Unleashing?

European leaders, insulated in their Brussels bubble, are playing with existential fire. They speak of war with Russia as if it were a larger version of Ukraine—a conventional conflict with a tidy conclusion.

“The war in Ukraine remains the most central and consequential crisis for Europe’s future…It is not only the destiny of Ukraine that is at stake. It is Europe’s destiny ”— Politico, 24 February 2025.

 

They seem to have forgotten the arsenals of nuclear weapons pointed at their capitals. They are so desperate to maintain their geopolitical relevance that they are risking total destruction. Either they are ignorant of what modern war between nuclear powers means, or they are so intoxicated by power that they believe they will be spared.


The March of Folly 

The drone scare is not a security alert. It is a political weapon. The interviews with children are not educational; they are indoctrination. The calls for preparedness are not prudent; they are a march towards the abyss.

Europe’s leaders, having failed in Ukraine, are now trying to save face by risking a continent-wide war. They are creating an enemy to justify their existence, conditioning their children to die for it, and distracting their populations from the decay at home.

This is not strategy. It is suicide dressed up as policy.

twitterlinkedininstagramflickrfoursquaremail