Posted on by — Leave a comment

NATO’s Bloody Empire: From Yugoslavia to Ukraine

 1: The Myth of NATO’s ‘Peacekeeping’

  • Hook: “In 1990, NATO promised no eastward expansion. Today, it’s at Russia’s border—surrounded by U.S. bases, hungry for Ukraine. This is how ‘defensive’ alliances start world wars.”

Not an inch of #NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.” —Memorandum of conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and James Baker in Moscow, 9 Feb 9 1990
Image 1: Not an inch of #NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.” —Memorandum of conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and James Baker in Moscow, 9 Feb 9 1990

 

  • Thesis: NATO is a post-WW2 relic that morphed into a global enforcer for Western capital and militarism.

2. NATO’s Original Sins: A Rogue Alliance

  • 1999: Yugoslavia (The ‘Humanitarian’ War Lie)

    • Image 2: On March 24, 1999, the NATO bloc led by the US commenced terror bombings of Yugoslavia, which lasted 78 days

      78-day bombing of Serbia (including hospitals, bridges, TV stations).

    • Result: 2,500+ civilians killed, Kosovo turned into a U.S. base (Camp Bondsteel).

      Image 3: Camp_bondsteel_kosovo

       

  • 2001: Afghanistan (Forever War)

    • NATO’s first “Article 5” invocation—used to justify 20 years of occupation.

      Image 4: attack against one Ally is an attack against all — is at the core of the NATO Alliance and remains an enduring principle binding all Allies together.

    • Result: $2T spent, 200,000+ dead, Taliban back in power.

  • 2011: Libya (Democracy = Oil Theft)

    • UN Resolution 1973 abused to bomb Libya (50,000+ dead).

      Image 5: The NATO bombing plunged Libya into a humanitarian disaster, killing thousands of people.

    • Result: Slave markets, chaos, and $200B in oil contracts for France/Italy.

3. NATO Expansion: The Road to Ukraine

  • Broken Promises: Declassified docs show NATO vowed “not one inch eastward” (1990). (Image 1)

  • Provoking Russia:

    • 2008: Bush pushes NATO membership for Ukraine/Georgia → Russia warns red line.

      Image 6: Ukrainian politicians hold banners as they stage a protest during the Russian State Duma lower house of parliament speaker Sergei Naryshkin’s speech in Bucharest, Romania in November 2015. Photo provided by Inquam Photos via Reuters

    • 2014: U.S.-backed coup in Ukraine → Crimea annexation.

    • Image 7: A protester sits on a monument in Kyiv during clashes with riot police in February 2014. Louisa Gouliamaki/AFP/Getty

      2022: NATO arms Ukraine → Proxy war begins.

  • Cold War 2.0: NATO now includes Finland, Sweden, encircling Russia.

    Image 9: Sweden(April 2024) & Finland(May 2022) join Nato

     

4. NATO’s Kill List: Syria, Iraq, and Beyond

  • Syria: NATO allies (Turkey, U.S.) fund jihadists to overthrow Assad → 500,000 dead.

    image 10: 2 Nato nations at war in Syria

     

  • Iraq: No NATO mandate, but key members (UK, Poland) join Bush’s WMD lies → 1M+ dead.

    Image 11: 2003: President Bush announces invasion of Iraq

     

  • Africa: AFRICOM (NATO’s cousin) fuels coups (Mali, Niger) to control resources.

    Image 12: The legacies of colonialism and the US War on Terror in West Africa

5. NATO’s Endgame: WW3 for Hegemony

  • Ukraine as Proxy: $200B in weapons prolongs war; NATO admits “weakening Russia” is the goal.

    Image 13: NATO Chief Says Weakening Russia Will Help US Focus on Challenging China – Newsweek

     

  • Asia Pivot: NATO now targets China (“global alliance”).

    Image 14: China promises ‘resolute response’ to any NATO expansion in Asia

     

  • Nuclear Brinkmanship: NATO stations nukes in Belgium, Germany, Turkey → Russia responds.

    Image 15: NATO nuclear weapons mapped

6. Conclusion: Dismantle the War Machine

  • “NATO doesn’t ‘defend’—it conquers. It doesn’t ‘stabilize’—it loots. Until we abolish it, WW3 is a matter of time.”

  • Call to Action:

    • “Share this article. Protest NATO summits. Demand your country exit this death cult. #AbolishNATO”

Posted on by — Leave a comment

Israel isn’t a Country—It’s a U.S. Military Base with a Flag

1. The Illusion of a ‘Natural’ Israel

  • Hook: “Nations are born from history, people, and land—yet Israel was born from a British memo, Western guilt, and relentless violence.”

  • Thesis: Israel is a geopolitical construct, not a legitimate state, sustained by the West (especially the U.S.) for imperial control over West Asia.

2. How the West Created Israel

A. British Colonialism (1917-1948)

  • Balfour Declaration (1917): Britain promised Zionists a “homeland” in Palestine—despite Palestinians being 90% of the population.

  • Mandatory Palestine: British forces crushed Arab revolts (e.g., 1936-39) to pave way for Zionist migration.

B. 1948: Nakba & Western Complicity

  • Ethnic Cleansing: Zionist militias (like Haganah) expelled 750,000+ Palestinians (destroying 500+ villages).

A female officer in charge of the range at the Hen women’s corps camp near Tel Aviv, Palestine, gives a demonstration in the handling of a Sten gun on June 15, 1948 in the Arab-Israeli War. Although non-combatants, members the new women’s Army in Israel are taught to use guns for defense. (AP Photo)

  • U.S./EU Recognition: Truman recognized Israel 11 minutes after its declaration—rewarding terrorism (e.g., Deir Yassin massacre).

C. Post-1948: The West’s Blank Check

 

  • U.S. Funding: Israel receives $3.8 billion/year in military aid (largest cumulative recipient in history).In addition to financial and military aid, the U.S. provides large-scale political support, having used its United Nations Security Council veto power 42 times against resolutions condemning Israel, out of 83 times in which its veto has been used.

  • Diplomatic Shield: U.S. vetoes 50+ UN resolutions against Israel (e.g., blocking ceasefires, condemning settlements).

3. Israel’s ‘Borders’ Are a Fiction

  • No Defined Borders: Israel refuses to declare borders under its “Basic Law” (to allow endless expansion).

  • Settler Colonialism: 700,000+ settlers in the West Bank (violating international law) with U.S./EU funding.

  • Greater Israel Plan: Maps in Israeli schools show “Israel” stretching from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean.

4. Israel as a U.S. Military Outpost

  • Proxy Wars: Israel attacks U.S. enemies (Syria, Lebanon, Iran proxies) with U.S. weapons.

 

 

 

 

  • Tech & Surveillance: Israeli spyware (Pegasus) and drones used globally to repress dissent (e.g., Saudi Arabia, Mexico).

  • Testing Ground: U.S. tests weapons (e.g., Iron Dome) in Gaza before selling them worldwide.

5. The ‘Middle East’ Is a Western Invention

  • Orientalist Myth: The term “Middle East” was coined by British imperialists to control Asia’s heartland.

  • Israel’s True Geography: It’s in West Asia, not the “Middle East”—a term meant to center the West as the “default.”

6. Conclusion: Dismantling the Myth

  • “Israel exists not because of ancient ties, but because the West needed a violent watchdog in West Asia. Until we reject this fiction, apartheid and war will continue.”

  • Amnesty International’s report on Israels Apartheid can be reached here: https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/MDE1551412022ENGLISH.pdf

 

  • Call to Action:

    • “Share this article. Boycott complicit corporations (HP, Siemens, Lockheed Martin). Demand an end to U.S. aid.”

Posted on by — Leave a comment

NATO’s Bloody Bargain: How Rutte & Co. Trade Civilian Lives for Trump’s Whims

The Secretary-General’s fawning message—calling Trump ‘THE man’—reveals an alliance that would rather lick boots than lead.

From Iran to Ukraine, ‘collective defense’ now means collective cowardice

1. The Obsequious Crime

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114738606142462442

Let’s parse this disgrace line by line:

  • ‘Donald—you’re THE man!’
    Not ‘Mr. President’ or ‘our ally.’ A frat-boy cheer for a man who called NATO ‘a protection racket’—delivered while Ukrainian soldiers die from delayed U.S. arms shipments.

  • ‘Your bold strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites’
    A war crime euphemism. These were attacks on IAEA-monitored facilities (Natanz, Fordow) with zero evidence of weaponization. The UN Charter Article 2(4) prohibits such strikes—not that NATO cares anymore.

  • ‘Leadership NATO needs!’
    Translated: ‘We’ll applaud any violence if it keeps you funding our irrelevance.’

2. The Bloody Context

A. NATO’s Existential Panic

  • Trump’s 2018 threat: ‘I’ll withdraw unless you pay’

  • 2024 reality: European allies still below 2% GDP defense spending

  • Rutte’s calculus: ‘Praise his crimes, and maybe he won’t disband us.’

B. The Iranian Dead
[INSERT YOUR IMAGE OF BOMBED IRANIAN SITE]
*”The ‘peaceful nuclear depots’ Trump hit:

  • Isfahan: University physics lab

  • Fordow: Civilian enrichment (IAEA cameras installed)

  • Natanz: Monitored under JCPOA

Rutte thanked Trump for bombing the very inspections NATO claims to champion

3. Sheep’s Clothing, Wolf’s Teeth

*”NATO’s PR machine will claim this was ‘diplomatic pragmatism.’ But compare:

When Russia Does It When Trump Does It
Crimea annexation = ‘Suspension!’ Bombing Iran = ‘Leadership!’
Cyberattacks = ‘Article 5 threat!’ Withholding Ukraine aid = ‘Pay-to-play!’

This isn’t diplomacy—it’s a protection racket with nicer fonts.

4. Indictment

By endorsing illegal strikes, Rutte makes NATO co-conspirators in:

  • War crimes (Geneva Conventions, Art. 85)

  • Nuclear hypocrisy (Ignoring Israel’s 600 warheads)

  • Moral bankruptcy (Cheering a man who called fallen soldiers ‘losers’)

5. NATO’s Whiplash Hypocrisy

2017 Stoltenberg:
“NATO’s strength is its commitment to rules and values.” 4

2020 Trump:
“NATO is worse than Amazon—they rip us off!” 9

2024 Rutte:
“Thank you for violating those rules, sir!”

Dignity isn’t negotiable—no matter how desperately NATO begs.

NATO’s Mark Rutte, caught mid-chuckle on his way to thank Trump for violating international law. Some men earn respect – others beg for it

 

Posted on by — 1 Comment

From Iraq to Iran: The Same Old Lies

In 2003, the U.S. invaded Iraq based on fabricated evidence of ‘weapons of mass destruction.’ Today, we hear identical rhetoric about Iran’s nuclear program—despite the IAEA’s repeated confirmations that no evidence of weaponization exists. The parallels are chilling:

  • Then: Colin Powell’s infamous UN speech waving a fake vial of anthrax.
  • Now: Netanyahu’s cartoon bomb theatrics at the UN (2012) and recycled ‘imminent threat’ claims.
    The lesson? When governments cry ‘WMDs,’ always ask: Where’s the proof? And why does Israel—with 600+ undeclared warheads—get a free pass while Iran faces bombs and sanctions?
Israel’s Dimona nuclear facility (600+ warheads) vs. IAEA-monitored Iranian sites. Who’s the real threat?